OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
105568326

This is also "Acaster Malbis, from survey", like the last one was.

105549042

નમસ્તે,
મને નથી લાગતું કે way/948520500 અહીં કોઈ બિલ્ડિંગને અનુરૂપ છે?
કૃપા કરીને પૂછો કે તમને કોઈ પ્રશ્નો થયા છે કે નહીં.
શ્રેષ્ઠ શુભેચ્છા,
એન્ડી

105549042

Hello,
I don't think that way/948520500 corresponds to a building at all here?
Please ask if you've got any questions.
Best Regards,
Andy

105540849

Hello,
Just for info, the merge of Crawley Road here introduced an extra "spur" into the boundary of the "Dedham Vale AONB" (9336585) relation, so that afterwards it looked like https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/17TQ . I've fixed that now so it's back to the same shape as it was. One part of Crawley Road should be in the relation and one part shouldn't, so I've split it in two.
Similarly the St Edmund Way (358939) - which also follows part of Crawley Road - needs the road to be split further to the south as well.
I hope this all makes sense - if not (or if you've got any other questions) please don't hesitate to ask!
Best Regards,
Andy

105560322

This also snips off a couple of similar spurs from relation/358939 , which also appear to have been introduced by merging.

12816353

Hello,
I guess that "carpot" should perhaps be "carport" on way/177262683 perhaps?
Best Regards,
Andy

105365143

Thanks for fixing this!

105528267

See also osm.org/user_blocks/5080 .

105529408

See also my comment on changeset/105528267 .

105529068

See also my comment on changeset/105528267 .

105528730

See also my comment on changeset/105528267 .

105528267

Hello,
I've reverted this because this changeset broke the relation for Morocco, leaving it not closed.
Note that work is under way to fix the Spanish / Moroccan borders here in line with international treaties - see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2021-May/086552.html and previous list messages, and also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-es/2021-May/017737.html etc.
Best Regards,
Andy

105362590

Բարեւ,
Ուղղակի մի հարցական հարց ՝ node/5445022407: Http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=5445022407 կայքէջում կարող եմ տեսնել, որ դուք հայկական անունը տեղափոխել եք «անուն» -ից «alt_name», իսկ ադրբեջանական անունը ՝ «alt_name» ՝ «name» « OpenStreetMap- ում «անունը» սովորաբար ներկայացնում է «տարածքում խոսվող լեզուն», այլ ոչ թե ցանկացած «պաշտոնական երկիր», որը ինչ-որ տեղ կարող է պատկանել: Դուք ասում եք, որ այստեղ ադրբեջաներեն ավելի շատ են խոսում, քան հայերեն:
Հարգանքներով
Էնդի

105362590

Hello,
Just a question question about node/5445022407 . I can see at http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=5445022407 that you've moved the Armenian name from "name" to "alt_name" and the Azerbaijani name from "alt_name" to "name". In OpenStreetMap, the "name" normally represents the "language spoken in the area", rather any "official country" that somewhere might belong to. Are you saying that Azerbaijani is spoken more than Armenian here?
Best Regards,
Andy

105169858

બાકી રહેલી ટિપ્પણીઓ જોવા માટે, અનુવાદિત, https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=en&tl=gu&u=http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid%3D12874571 જુઓ

105169858

To see comments that have been left, translated, see https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=en&tl=gu&u=http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid%3D12874571

105477146

Բարեւ,
way/946937439 կարծես թե ամբողջովին հորինված է: Ինչու՞ եք այն ավելացրել:
Կարծում էիք, որ այն կառուցվելու է: Եթե չկարողանաք լավ բացատրություն տալ, ապա մենք ստիպված կլինենք վերադարձնել ձեր փոփոխությունները:
Հարգանքներով
Էնդի Թաունսենդ, OSM- ի տվյալների աշխատանքային խմբի անունից:

105477146

Hello,
way/946937439 appears to be entirely fictional. Why did you add it?
Did you think that it is going to be built? If you can't give a good explanation, then we'll have to revert your edits.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

105446518

Also, if there's a problem with not being able to see clearly enough on the screen that you are using, perhaps do some mapping elsewhere, where it's less critical?

105446518

Try different imagery sources - Bing is quite detailed, but the trees have grown over the eastern end. Esri Clarity appears to be older, but the trees are less prominent and you can see the building shapes better.