Something definately went wrong with way/512114867/history (which you've snce fixed - thanks) - any idea how that happened?

Hello,
Can you explain what data was "corrected" here? This changeset has a very large area, and it's not clear what "Corrected data" means.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hi,
Just for info - I deleted a duplicate "Birth of Sky" artwork node/4936507323/history creatd in here. The other one that you added had more info on it so I left that.
node/4846191746
Best Regards,
Andy

Hi will,
Quick question - does the edit to the location of node/3726792237/history after your change look OK to you?
Best Regards,
Andy

The Chinese media think it is controlled by India: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-39638543 :
"a region that is part of China's territory but in which some areas are currently controlled by India," a Chinese state media report said.

OK, thanks.

Hello HelioFelix,
Any imports into OSM must follow the procedure described at osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines . It's important to discuss imports with other mappers so that they can confirm that the data is licence-compatible and make sure that is is sensible in other ways.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Hi,
Just wondered what the source of the "lit" change to way/150995433 was?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello ArjanO,
The data that you've imported here clearly contained some problems (data at latitude 0, longitude 0). Was it discussed anywhere? See the links from osm.wiki/Import which describe the steps that should happen before an import takes place.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Hello,
All your changesets are just titled "create changeset". Can you please explain what you are doing?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Can you explain the changes you've made here? "fixing relations" doesn't really explain anything.
As you may be aware, the boundaries here have been subject to politically-motivated edits in the past. It'd be helpful to all other mappers if you could explain the changes.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Thanks.

Any idea what the change to way/256498994/history was here? It seems odd that it has got caught up in a "my house" tidy-up.

@Mike For info see changeset/50175156 and osm.wiki/Nottingham/Broadmarsh_Re-development - it's very much a work in progress at the moment.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hi,
It looks like there's a "partial non-reuse of nodes" issue here.
I'm guessing that way/509890783 is supposed to abut the landuse that surrounds it - it reuses nodes at the eastern side (which I'd expect) but not at the western, so there's an overlap. I guess that this was not deliberate?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hi James,
This looks very much like a mechanical edit - was it discussed anywhere?
Not that I expect that anyone would necessarily have complained, but a "heads up" to anyone who's consuming the data would have been nice.
Also, I presume that you did actually check all 135 nodes to see if they were actually plausibly dog waste bins (not in the middle of a building or a lake, for example).
Best Regards,
Andy

@zstadler OSM does not have "approved" tags, If someone has mapped something beyond a "cave entrance" as a "natural=cave" then that's perfectly OK. As noted above, as with any "odd tagging" I'd expect local mappers to check examples near them, as I presume you did on changeset/50494749 , so thanks for that.

Hi,
You've got Europa Link with a "ref" of C760. Is that actually signed? It didn't used to be (a couple of years ago). If not, official_ref would be the preferred way of tagging it - see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/official_ref#values .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.
Best Regards,
Andy