Hello,
You've added "designation=shed" to e.g. way/158177904 here. I think you might have meant "description"? "designation" is used to indicate the legal classification of something - see osm.wiki/Key%3Adesignation for details.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hi,
Thanks for that.
Regards,
Andy

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Is this perhaps a pub? If so, "amenity=pub" would be the appropriate tagging for it.
Also is the operator perhaps "JD Wetherspoon"?
Best Regards,
Andy

Yes, it really is called that.

@Supaplex Geothings data imports (here and elsewhere) have caused lots of problems. I commented on this changeset to tell you that the data that you were modifying is probably misplaced.

Hi just spotted something a bit odd with the Loch Katrine Aqueduct. If you look at way/216514037#map=18/56.16172/-4.47594&layers=H it seems to go east of the Duchray Bridge across Duchray Water whereas there is an aqueduct way/216514056/history to the west. Presumably one of these needs changing :)
Best Regards,
Andy

Oops - you've added a node in the middle of the Atlantic in this changeset!

Hi - just wondered about the layer tag on way/164651832 . It's set to layer=1, but the bit to the north is layer=-1. Both sections are location=underground.
Cheers,
Andy

Something involving MOT would make perfect sense to me - see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=mot#keys and http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=mot#values for where it's been used before. "inspection" is hardly used for MOTs; see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=inspection#keys .

(Traducción automática al es)
Hola Nemigo,
En OSM trazamos el mundo como existe, no como nos gustaría que fuera. Cambiar un McDonald's a un McMerda no está bien - no lo hagas de nuevo.
Atentamente,
Andy Townsend, en nombre del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM.

Hello Nemigo,
In OSM we map the world as it exists, not as we'd like it to be. Changing a McDonald's to a McMerda is not OK - don't do it again.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Whatever it was, thanks for fixing the data :)

This changeset added a large number of streetlights in the middle of a field in France. How did that happen?
See node/4990806032/history#map=18/47.97477/3.31544 for example.

No problem - all done in changeset/50807427 .

It looks like the same place to me - I'd just merge the two values onto one node and leave it as a restaurant.

Hello,
It looks like some of the changes that you made here aren't actually valid. For example, way/288217838 is extremely unlikely to be part of a cane processing plant. I've been to the Netherlands many times, and rolling fields of sugarcane were notable by their absence. In fact, the most cursory web search turns up https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puttershoek which makes it clear that it was a beet plant and that "Most of its buildings were demolished in 2012".
Therefore, please don't make this sort of edit - it adds nothing of value to OSM.
. Mechanical edits need to be discussed first, as per osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
node/5007981725 seems to be a duplicate of the pub on the corner. Probably worth merging them.
Best Regards,
Andy

OK, Thanks.

If you want to add test data you can try https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ - it's just like the "live" site but with just test data in it.

relation/3839665/history was a super-relation (as you can see from the previous members of it). Looking at one of those, relation/152361 does not appear to be a member of any super-relation. What was relation/3839665/history a duplicate of?
Best Regards,
Andy