Hello,
You've added way/491030108/history but it seems to overlap and be a duplicate of way/263939032/history which has existed since 2014.
Best Regards,
Andy

Halo,
Anda telah menambahkan "building = yes" di way/491026046 namun tidak terlihat seperti bangunan, hanya area di mana ada beberapa bangunan?
Salam Hormat,
Andy

Hello,
You've added "building=yes" on way/491026046 but it doesn't look like a building, just an area in which there are several buildings?
Best Regards,
Andy

> Second, sidewalk=* is a temporary tag and should be replaced by drawn highway=footway.

No, it's not a temporary tag. It's a permanent tag to indicate that a sidewalk that is part of the road infrastructure exists.
Depending on the local environment it may be more appropriate to tag sidewalks using sidewalk=* on the road or as separate footways. In most built-up areas in the UK sidewalk=* is more appropriate because the sidewalk is part of the road - there's just a kerb between the two. Pedestrians can both legally and physically cross from the sidewalk on one side of the road to another at any point. Mapping a road junction like https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=21&lat=53.1014321&lon=-1.2550828 completely misrepresents how pedestrians are allowed to use it.
Please don't let your (greatly appreciated!) enthusiasm for detailed mapping get away from the reality - aerial imagery can be misleading and out of date, and if you're unsure of the reality somewhere please do add map notes so that locals can verify the situation.
Richard Fairhurst summed it up really well (in a very different context): https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-May/077993.html .

Thanks!

Does it actually match the on-the-ground situation though? I'm not convinced that there are two parallel footways either side of Regent Street (and I've seperately commented in a changeset of the user that added them).
Have you been there to have a look?

Hello,
You've added a footpath way/488741439 . Are you sure that that actually exists, and that there is really no access from it to the junction of Pelham Road / Regent Street? Regent Street is sidewalk=both (or was the last time I went past it). Are you really saying that there are two parallel paths here - the one associated with the road, and a separate one with no access to the road? This seems very odd.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Are you sure that there is no access from the road to the path at node/4810318439 ?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.
It's been deleted now, but have you any idea how incorrect latitude and longitude values could have got into the data that you added?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello MacaroniHomie,
OpenStreetMap's a map of things that really exist, so if there isn't a meadow on your house, please don't map one there.
Sorry about that...
Best Regards,
Andy

Hola,
Por favor, no agregue "características del juego" como un "Parque dos pokémon" a OpenStreetMap. Si hay algo realmente en el suelo y es realmente llamado, entonces por favor, map, pero si sólo aparece en un juego, por favor, no !.
Atentamente,
Andy

Hello,
Please don't add "game features" such as a "Parque dos pokémon" to OpenStreetMap. If there's something really there on the ground and it's really called that then please map it, but if it only appears in a game, please don't!.
Best Regards,
Andy

Χαίρετε,
Μην προσθέτετε "δυνατότητες παιχνιδιού" όπως το node/4567649976 στο OpenStreetMap. Αν υπάρχει κάτι πραγματικά στο έδαφος, χαρτογραφήστε το, αλλά αν εμφανίζεται μόνο σε ένα παιχνίδι, παρακαλώ μην το κάνετε.
Τις καλύτερες ευχές,
Andy

Hello,
Please don't add "game features" such as node/4567649976 to OpenStreetMap. If there's something really there on the ground, map it, but if it only appears in a game, please don't.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello Balakhadze,
Can you please use more meaningful changeset comments than "Needed change"? That doesn't really explain what you did and why.
Best Regards,
Andy

Personally I wouldn't set too much store by the OSM wiki :)
If something looks like a cycleway, I'd map it as one.
Cheers,
Andy

Hello,
Are the name of all of these features such as way/491169857really called "Garden"?
Best Regards,
Andy

Given that so much in this changeset such as node/3986928355 (and unfortunately many of this mapper's other contributions) is obviously rubbish then in the absense of any explanation I'd be tempted to just revert this.

You might find that https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=14&lat=53.16751&lon=-1.08988 gives a better picture of Sherwood Pines (tree types, for example).

Can you explain what you mean by "fixed the tagging"? http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=47950158 shows a geometry change; did you verify that? If not, please don't make changes like this - it makes fixing things properly much harder.
Please instead either let someone who can do the job properly know about the problem or (if you can't find anyone) mail the DWG.
Best Regards,
Andy