Hello Müritz-Nationalpark,
Lots of people have been trying to get in contact with you about the changes that you are making:

http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5105649

You haven't replied to any of these since January. Please do take the time to reply to these comments and explain the changes that you're making (especially where you're deleting things from the map).

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.

I'm guessing that "ref=route" on way/338384368/history is a mistagging, but I've no idea what the correct tagging should be there :(

I was pretty surprised too :)

Strange as it may seem, as far as I could tell from the signage, way/335031789 really did appear to be an abbatoir specialising in cats.

Hi,
Any reason you've not set way/34570230/history back to "highway=secondary", which it was before the highway tag was removed?
Best Regards,
Andy

The changeset comment "Buildings" doesn't seem to reflect the actual changes made here.
Could you explain in a bit more detail what changes were actually made?

way/87406131/history was previously a forest; are you sure it's best tagged as a park and not a forest at all?

To be honest, I think it's a JOSM bug too, since it's happened to a few other people too. So far no-one's been able to say "I did XYZ just before the problem appeared".

@kreuzschnabel Please don't change service to unclassified unless you've surveyed on the ground and can see that it's council maintained or otherwise obviously qualifies as an unclassified road. I can think of plenty of highway=service roads near me that lead to more that one property, and more than a few driveways too!

Hello,
As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.
It's been deleted now, but have you any idea how incorrect latitude and longitude values could have got into the data that you added?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello Rowland,
You've not added a changeset comment here, so it's difficult to understand what's going on. Also, what does "created by=Tayberry" mean? Is that something that you've used to import or otherwise process this data?
Please do use meaningful changeset comments so that other mappers know what's happening, and if you are doing any sort of import, you really do need to read and follow osm.wiki/Import and the links from it before continuing.
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks!

Was this change following community discussion, as was suggested? Previous comments had suggested that a number of people thought that a "leisure=park" tag wasn't appropriate here.

Thanks for fixing!

Just a quick note about way/261166184 here - you've moved it to match the Bing imagery, but that is clearly offset with regard to the GPS traces. There are enough either side of the B6020 to align the imagery properly, and if you do that you'll notice that that building is now offset from its true position by 2m or so. You've also moved the road so that it's offset from its true position too: way/261166184 . Can you please move everything back?

Haha - thanks for that. Are you going to fix the name?

مرحبا،
هو node/4838391421 حقا موقع نزهة داخل مبنى، أو أنه ربما مقعد أو محكمة الغذاء؟
تحياتي الحارة،
أندي

Hello,
Is node/4838391421 really a picnic site within a building, or it it perhaps a bench or food court?
Best Regards,
Andy

Halo,
Anda telah menambahkan way/491030108/history namun tampaknya tumpang tindih dan menjadi duplikat way/263939032/history yang telah ada sejak tahun 2014.
Salam Hormat,
Andy