Hello,
You've used https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/ as a source here - is that actually licence-compatible with OSM? The text on https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page would suggest not.
Best Regards,
Andy

Any idea about the overlap between way/471430341/history and way/471430347 here?

Would it be possible to provide some information about what the actual change was here?

Hi,
Are you sure that way/468372827 is actually a "sidewalk"? Also what were the changes in Mansfield in this change? The "duplicate node" that was removed appears to be in Skegness.
Best Regards,
Andy

Also, you seem to have actually deleted the school area way/449579231/history in this changeset. Any reason you couldn't just restore it rather than dobbing the tags onto a building way/471363752 ? See e.g. http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/lF3 .

Oh, and please do use meaningful changeset comments.
"remove self intersection of area outline" will be meaningless to 99% of OSMers.

Hi,
Just checking - have you verified that all the underlying changes here look sensible (e.g. checked that school boundary using Christian's site, checked that node/4630769103 likely exists and isn't Pokemon rubbish)? If not, please don't make pure geometry changes like this - they make correcting the data harder, not easier.
Best Regards,
Andy

Oops,
There was something at latitude 0, longitude 0 in here as well, like there was in
changeset/44267960 .
Do you know how it can have got there?
Best Regards,
Andy

Oops - looks like a bug similar to the one mentioned in changeset/43801435 is still there (adding things at null island this time, not moving them there).

Bonjour jseigneuret,
Cette modification a été soulevée avec OpenStreetMap Data Working Group parce qu'il ressemble à une modification mécanique.
Comme décrit sur osm.wiki/FR:Code_de_conduite_des_modifications_automatis%C3%A9es "Le code de conduite suivant représente un certain consensus partagé par ceux qui se préoccupent des éditions automatisées. Si vous ne pouvez pas ou ne voulez pas suivre ce code de conduite, veuillez ne pas faire tourner un bot ou faire de changement automatisée de grande échelle". L'exigence de discussion est pour quelques raisons, notamment pour permettre aux gens de proposer des changements (le cas échéant) et de permettre aux consommateurs de données de modifier les données qu'ils recherchent.
Pouvez-vous nous expliquer si cette procédure a été suivie et, le cas échéant, où elle a été discutée?
Meilleures salutations,
Andy Townsend, au nom du Groupe de travail sur les données d'OpenStreetMap.

Hello jseigneuret,
This changeset has been raised with OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group because it looks like a mechanical edit.
As described at osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct "The Automated Edits code of conduct must be followed at all times when performing Automated edits to the OpenStreetMap database". The requirement for discussion is for a few reasons, including to allow people to suggest changes (if any are needed) and to allow data consumers to change the data that they look for.
Can you explain if this procedure was followed, and if so where it was discussed?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.

Where we have been able to have the conversation with the author of the changeset we have sometimes been able to do investigation on a sub-changeset level, but in this case I'd be tempted to just remap based on allowable data sources - it'll probably be quicker than going through the previous edits one by one, and also it's next to impossible to prove that a certain change didn't come from Google, unless it actually contradicts what Google has.

Hi Teiron,
The changeset source for changeset/42721909 is "Geoportal 2: Ortofotomapa (zdjęcia lotnicze),googlemaps". I explained the problem on there and said "If you have any questions please email the Data Working Group on data@osmfoundation.org ". We heard nothing back (perhaps because the mapper has not been seen since October), so had to take that changeset source at face value.
Best regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

I've also changed a nearby TIGER-derived bridge to be the tunnel that both Bing and Mapbox aerial imagery suggest that it is. There's still _lots_ more to map around here though.

Hello,
Is node/4616595390 really a car shop or is it just where you parked your car in Chichester?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Is node/4609905889 really a "chalet", or is it just somewhere that you were staying run by someone called Celia?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

You may not be aware, but when you edit OpenStreetMap you're editing a map that everyone can see, not just your personal copy. I'm guessing that "Mum" here is not be a tourist attraction as such, but just a bookmark.
Please do continue editing, but please do only add things that are verifiable on the ground. If you want to add a personal bookmark to MAPS.ME you can - just select the thing that you want to bookmark and select "save" and then "bookmark".

Best Regards,
Andy

Hello, you've changed a bus stop name here node/469760772/history from "Heathrow Terminal 4" to "Spare", which doesn't make a lot of sense. Is that really what it's called?
Best Regards,
Andy

I've changed this back. Clearly the Megabus doesn't stop in the library - it wouldn't fit through the door.

Erm - way/426558838 is the "House of Wally" in South Sudan (with Wally's Pond just to the west). Are you sure about that?
Also way/468507905 is "-2 metres wide" which doesn't make a lot of sense.
Cheers,
Andy