SimonPoole's Comments
| Post | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Adding Addresses | What works reasonably well if you have building outlines already available in the OSM data (or have added them yourself before going out on a survey is to use vespucci to add house numbers directly to the buildings. I would suspect that this works just as well with the iOS based mobile editor. |
|
| 1 million is a big number | @dcp we actually have something over 300’000 contributors that have made edits (the numbers on alltogetherlost only count the last editors of objects). As to the 1’000’000 accounts, I believe reporting the number is quite valid (well at least in marketing terms). Particularly since we know that we have a substantial number of contributors that register an account, go away and come back a long time later and start editing. I am myself such a case with a good year between creating the account and my first edit. |
|
| noaddress layer on qa.poole.ch | Ed First question: not easy to answer and I don’t have a strong opionion on if it makes sense to duplicate the information. Wrt site relations: currently that would seem to be very expensive to implement, I will have a look at it asap. Simon |
|
| Yet another noname layer ... |
None of the “noname” tagging proposals was ever “accepted” so using the validate:* schema is just as valid as what I’m currently supporting. There is no reason I can’t support this tagging variant going forward and probably I will. Wrt *_link: I have no strong feelings about this, and will probably move that to the “orange” might have a nome or might not category. |
|
| Yet another noname layer ... |
The problem with both “nosurface” and “nospeed” that that there is no global consensus if they are really needed. For example in Western Europe you would always assume surface asphalt unless specified otherwise, similar with speed limits where you would assume the national max speeds (for the road type and location) for roads that don’t have maxspeed tagged. |
|
| Yet another noname layer ... |
As the blog post says red: major and minor roads, service with service=alley without name or ref tag and it has been that way since day one. And yes you are quite correct, there are masses of roads in France that should have name or ref tags and don’t. |
|
| Yet another noname layer ... | That is a bit of a tricky question. The main reason that the overlay supports unsigned and noname tags is to avoid mappers constantly resurveying the same roads (false positive suppression). If you live in an area that normaly doesn’t have street names the overlay doesn’t really make a lot of sense and insofar it is not necessary to weed out the false positives anyway. |
|
| Zu highway=living_street | Bitte in der Schweiz -keine- maxspeed Einträge machen, die Sache ist rechtlich klar und maxspeed voll redundant. Wir müssen ja nicht jeden Blödsinn unserer nördlichen Nachbarn mitmachen. |