Reverted in #56318556

@Странник the new version should be available from f-droid as soon as they've build it.

@Странник while the underlying reason for the issue is not clear, i've added some protection against what is likely happening (with some debug information so that we may be able to find the root cause). It has as far as we know, only happen twice up to now, so it must be fairly special circumstances.

This changeset damaged the boundary for the municipality of La Chaux-de-Fonds. THe problem has been fixed, but please be careful when editing.

Hi, thank you for contributing to OSM.

The data you have been adding seems to not conform to the current indoor tagging scheme osm.wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging (due to the number of relations used it seems you might be referring to the defunct IndoorOSM scheme).

In any case you need to add a building outline to the objects for non indoor enabled applications to be able to consume any information on the object at all.

@stedewa the source is stated as "Anciennes cartes de la confédération" Jonathan needs to show that whatever maps he was using is actually legit.

@stedewa after renewed inspection of the changes, I came to the following conclusions:

- its an import, not a manual edit, with other words it is easy to redo (if after discussion parts of it are determined OK)
- it is using an undocumented and likely non-legit source (not mentioning that it was completely undiscussed)
- it broke multiple boundaries in non-obvious ways

A fast, complete revert is the simplest, easiest and cleanest way to undo something, waiting longer would have increased the danger of somebody trying to fix things piecemeal making it far more difficult to rectify things.

Further note due to the large number of changes and the use of an external datasource this was further clearly an undiscussed import.

Reverted in #53502606

Reverted in #53502574

Reverted in #53502549

Reverted in #53502515

Reverted in #53502478

Reverted in #53502445

Reverted in #53502412

Reverted in #53502380

Reverted in #53502344

This and previous changesets have broken multiple really existing municipality borders in the canton Vaud.

Not only that, but the data you added is historic and doesn't belong in OSM in the first place, not to mention that your source hasn't been verified as legit.

Barring any good arguments to the contrary I'll start reverting the changesets in a couple of hours.

Hallo intruder53 und willkommen bei OSM.

Danke für dein Beitrag, bitte aber keine persönlichen Namen ins "name" Attribut schreiben, sondern es bei der Gebäudeadresse belassen (von wegen Datenschutz etc).

Ein andere Punkt du hast auch noch die Büros der swiss-host erfasst, dafür gibt es eigene "Objekte" und die Information sollte nicht direkt ans Gebäude.

Beides jetzt korrigiert.

Gruss

Hallo Subi1
Gratis ist nicht gleich offen.

Wenn du bei der DPD bist dann ist die beste Lösung, dass eure Fahrer das dokumentieren. Das könnte von Hand sein (auf eine ausgedruckten Version von OSM), oder mit dem Handy (einfach ein georeferenzierte Photo machen), oder z.B. mit mapillary (maillary.com).

Ansonsten ist es so,dass es in diversen Kantonen tatsächlich offene Adressdaten gibt (z.B. Kanton Bern, Solothurn, Schaffhausen und ab Januar auch Zürich). Und wir (die SOSM) arbeiten daran, dass möglichst früh die Adressdaten vom GWR (schweizweit) verfügbar sein werden.

Ich werde asap mal wieder die Situation im Ticino recherchieren.

Gruss