This CS also addresses the forest relation over lapping, thus rendering over the grassland strip

Hi,

Sorry about the "incorrect" name change of operator. It's in fact the ID editor tag upgrade wizard that filled this in changing Transdev Valence Mobilité to Transdev Valence resulting in a mismatch of operator name between the route and the route master which then is flagged in Osmose the next day. ID simply asks "upgrade the tags".
The person I communicated w/ in past was bhouse (Github name suggestion index (NSI)), about 1-1.5 years ago, on another preset-wizard mistake.

ciao

Hi,

OSM Inspector flagged multiple relation issues on this forest with farmland pockets, so I overhauled and simplified down from 13 to 6 members, then added few more. No need to map duplicate inner outlines, simply select the forest outline and the inside farmland, then hit the + sign in the pop up menu and correct roles are assigned automatically in ID editor.

See changeset/132003667

ciao

OK, render has been successfully restored till next time a mapper does not verify that members of the same multipolygon relation can not overlap each other's areas.

Hi

Note that the tag of virtual=yea is "supplemental" to the key of highway=footway to indicate it's for routing purposes only. A way with just this virtual=yes does not tell what the reason of existance is.

Ciao

Hello Antonio2162

Si prega di consultare changeset/131971748#map=18/41.43664/15.56372

Dovresti correggere le strade esistenti, non mapparne di nuove sopra di esse.

Ciao

Hi

Think you addr-essed this to the wrong person, I merely corrected the adrr key as flagged by New Keys QA and yes noticed the city was missing. The person to give your list to is over at changeset/131850052 but see another mapper already gave that one a longer reply.

ciao

Hi,

Hai mappato una via che in precedenza era già mappata e trasferita alle vie esistenti come percorso.

osm.org/edit?way=1021998632#map=17/41.34307/13.87280

Lo stesso è stato fatto con tutte le 7 tappe di Filippo.

ciao

Yup, the initial parking:side= is for where, what, the position section of the wiki and XD it is as Osmose still does not understand both nor does it when the orientation changes indicated by the changing 'marking' and I'm certainly not going to cut up a street because part is diagonal, parallel, perpendicular.

TGIF

Well aware of the poor responsiveness of the 1 CS mapper entries, but there's always hoping.

Here's the new street parking wiki. See section on orientation. parking:side is not intended for this.

osm.wiki/Street_parking

ciao

Hi FinixFighter

The 'how' parking is actually parking:(left/right/both)osm.wiki/Tag::orientation=....
4000 uses under new scheme just for the left side
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/parking:left:orientation#chronology

ciao

An edit I think that is for Tami to consider. Guess there is this 255 char restriction.

Hi,

Redone all your tagging except Keywords which does not, to my knowledge have an equivalent, maybe category but since it was used twice before, no alert, though proper all keywords are in small, so it would have been keywords.

ciao

Hi,

Redone all the tags on your POI. If your craft is not carpenter then please change that value, but without a shop, craft key the POI will not show on maps.

ciao

Hi Paul,

Only came here because OSM Inspector signalled an added way end node of way/1134979007 had somehow not been connected to the main road Sda Villa Castelli and in hindsight that was right too as there was a swerve added to the country way and a separation wall moving the connection some 100 meters south so I updated the way.

Anyway, IMHO ESRI Clarity is for the history books. Both regular and much newer ESRI and 2021 ground imagery showed this so I updated the object. Clarity as being severely outdated and JOSM reporting an offset issue for this imagery too, I only use this in emergency to verify what is/was on the ground in case ESRI is really bad or has clouds obscuring view.

Ciao

OK, thanks for the quick reply. Strangely your version is V1 of 5 years ago and then a mapper named bahnpirat added some bits at the Villanova station 7 years ago, yes 7, also version V1 that connect to this line. OSMOSE was complaining here about line nodes without any tower tags where first seeing few days ago thats mirage too.
Anyway, towers and layer 1 certainly rule out underground wiring. I'll get in touch with the other, the CS comments just not very informative about the reason(s)
Thanks again
PS guess somewhere the L key was hit on this line, where the connection to the substation at other end is certainly in the wrong place too.

Hi,

I don't know nothing about power lines, but today I mapped 69 towers from Moscufo to near Teramo, this one way/1134921734 (WIP), and discovered 2 nearby lines, 1 amongst this one way/503659675, a complete straight line which absolutely does not exist on any imagery today. Can you explain?

MGIA.

Most puzzling, this HV line with so far 69 towers starting at Moscufo shows a line from there to Villanova thereabouts, but only in the 300m map view. It disappears upon hitting Ctrl F5. The actual sat imagery does not show 2 nearby HV lines that were mapped, 1 surreal straight way/503659675#map=11/42.5156/13.9550 drawn but really does not exist. Was this a mock draft of the line now added?

Hi

What is this large 'hires' area flagged in the QA alert map?

Ciao