Interesting, apart from a 2 node change touching on North America and almost all of Europe, .... I've actually been using the tag source:width=estimated combined with width=n.n having 9000x use. Seemed consistent to me, source:name, source:maxheight ,:maxweight etc

FYI

Hi,

Your import is dumping building outlines with self intersection and smack on to of highways. such as this one way/1059184799
The buildings I checked have nothing at all to do with what is actually on the imagery so I suggest you reverse the whole and do the import(?) individually instead of 1100 in 1 go.

ciao

Moltissimo bennissimo ora. ;o)

👍

Just 10 easy fixes lurking in 1 place.

Hi,

Actually it was correctly tagged as area=yes. The real problem is that this area/path is crossing buildings to include it's obvious some node dragging took place of buildings while shaping the pedestrian area. Obviously the roof belongs on layer=1 and the pedestrian area needed connecting to the footways. QA will tell tomorrow if more problems exist here.

cheers

Hi

To follow up, would craft=refurbisher or reconditioner be any good to you? Your skill has has very few mentions. But, there's always someone who has to be the first on OSM so craft=refinisher which does have a description on the Free Dictionary as "To put a new finish on (furniture)." would be fine with me.

ciao

Hi

Your entry on OSM is flagged as feature less. It needs a shop or craft key e.g. craft=restorer... Cant find any past samples in system that capture refinishing, no other Mr Sandless.

Let me know
Ciao

Hi,

your entry for the trailer rental got flagged with code issues so I've made the adjustments for whatever I could figure out. Marked the property ways as paved and lit. Can't see in the imagery what type of paving, asphalt or concrete.

The 'tags' as I think are right you find here: node/9724729374

The system will flag me if there's anything more to tweak.

ciao from far away away.

Saw that few minutes ago.

Only 25 issues resolved in few minutes. \o/

Benötigt Korrekturen da mit drei Warnungen abgeschlossen, zum beispiel Strassen die Gebäuden kreuzen und Gebäuden denen Gebäuden kreuzen.

Bitte bitte.

If you do, you get slapped, if you don't you get slapped for not inputting a ref:msal. OSM needs to invent a dispensario function of a pharmacy. I've mapped 3 or 4 of these with very limited opening hours. Some of these pharma's have 2 VAT numbers at that, pick the wrong one and, yes Osmose causes more whiplash warning.

BTW, to my surprise I was told by a mapper who likes doing ref:mise checking that it is the fuel station operators themselves who have to input their info into the register which may explain there are non existing, in the register that is.

Sumup: The mess remains. Have a solution, of which not mapping these is not an option.

Cogito, ergo sum

Hi,

Flagged by Osmose, is this new track crossing the stream by bridge or have you got to wade thru i.e. a ford.

cheers.

Indeed, in edit mode nothing but the buoy is there.

Seeing massive intersection line linkage to your 0,0, something with a note on it to not remove node/3815077900
OSM Inspector sees dozens of red/orange lines emanating from the Ukraine to this point.

Thanks for your prompt reply.

Would propose tagging with disused:aeroway=runway same as the service road / taxiway.

ciao

Reminder.

This broken outline with just area=yes persists. What was/is the purpose of this unfinished business?
Was it in error and should it be removed?

cheers

Hi

Out of interest while closing some open boundaries in the region, why has this airport runway foot & bicycle=yes on it? The tagging of the runway has been changed many times, even the width changed from 50 to 60 to 50 meters. The http source link is broken so can't really read what's up with this feature with a crossing way.

Just curious me

ciao from italy.

Hi,

What is this *featureless* double line overlaying itself and denoted as object way/350991058 generating a change set warning "warnings:suspicious_name:generic_name". There's only a CLC explanation with a wiki link, the same link as the line below as part of the area relations. The line is linked to a farmland relation except there's no farmland, only a landfill on the left and a residential area on the right. Let me know please.

Ciao.

Yes I know, it's next to the steps at the top. Already mapped as a building, unfinished. There are 4 or 5 along the ciclovia towards Porto di Fossacesia what I remember from the last bike trip, all in the same unfinished state, come normale.

BTW why did you change the Buddha statue to fountain? The Fonte Peticcio spring, was already mapped close to the info board I added yesterday at Via Roma and Ciampoli on the other side of Via Adriatica.

Better be sure what you change and add and where.