Hi,

Should this 'no_right_turn' (road works still on) not have a bus exception(?) since all the bus routes that were/are broken here (dozens) are routed to take a right turn onto the Piazzale della Stazione Rebibbia. I've fixed 9 routes so far and assume except=bus i.e. yes on the turn restriction which I suspect is yes. That said, since the bus ways are by themselves restricted from use by other wheel traffic, the rule is to me redundant as the service road is tagged access=no + service=bus

Please let me know what this turn restrictions purpose is, temp or permanent (and bound to be forgotten). Mapping a construction area on the bus station affected zone would work with a check date and completion due date. QA will throw queries when still not cleared.

ciao

OK, restored rendering

Hi,

If the route is one-way to Foggia you might want to guide at the rotarie and junctions 'with' the flow instead of contra e.g. at the point where you switch from Via Val di Foro to Via Foro at the SS263. At some places you need to cut the roads at junction on/off connection points else you get funny excursions, like one showing a hard left than after 100 meters a u-turn. Also, if on foot things are fine, if on biki you might encounter points where per the continuous white centre line you're not allowed to do a U-Turn. Pericoloso.
Anyway, you can use the router of ID Editor to test if what you mapped on short sections is legal to include the consideration of some contadini being real funny if you cross their tracks when at the main road it says 'strada privata'. So far though by far the most are all friendly, where I've gone into the wild in MTB mode.

cheers

PS Vaguely remember you wrote in past you did that trip 5x or so, i.e. you'll know where the wild turkeys area ;o)

Hi,

Interesting route. As of this moment I see gaps in L'Aquila, Arielle and Lanciano. Suppose this is still very WIP.

Curious, you entered a 'from' in the relation, is there a 'To' too?

Happy routing.

Hi,

Your challenge went bust. The building does not show on the map because you left it with a self intersection. I've fixed it for you. ALWAYS verify if something shows up on the map a few minutes after saving. If not, check why that might be.

ciao

Heath renders, but why the farmland has a role with the heath when it nowhere borders directly I do not know.

Lets try again: You don't delete ways that had been freshly mapped and tagged from survey, tags you did not port to the new way. You could have changed the designation and wiggled the nodes, retaining the history.

You deleted the way mapped the week before after survey. It included tagging with stop spot at the bottom end and other tags, the top half still fenced off.. Where did those feature tags go?

NOT DONE.

Not only that, you deleted the parking way I mapped at Mulino and than put a new one in place. Impressionante.

Lol, I've working on Spoltore for days and who pops up.

Thank you.

In web browsers on Windows F5 is refresh page view from cache (in ID editor History view here). Ctrl+F5 is the forced refetch of the data from the (OSM) website, refreshing the cache itself at the same time.

ciao

Hi, your "Inserimento elementi rilevati il 20/05/22"resulted in you breaking the forest outline with complete loss of rendering on all maps.

When you edit large areas, check back few minutes after saving in view mode and hit Ctrl+F5. If things keep showing you're fine. If things start disappearing in blocks or whole, something is wrong. Time to open the editor to find the reason.

ciao

Hi,

Per my previous comments, point 1), connections is a MUST.

On converting, yes, you can cut an already mapped way at chosen points and relabel to track and change the paving.

When tagging as track, the preferred is to select the grading in the wizard dropdown box. No need to specify the specific surface, in fact Osmose QA flags a combo of grading and surface as conflicting.
What looks like a track to a house can still be left as service road or driveway, in which case you use the surface qualifier, many options in the drop down list to include your dirt or the more general 'compacted' which says more about the expected driving experience.

cheers

However wrong it my be in your view, I've added this one and several others sections to the Aurelian wall relation. There are more parts that for whatever reason were never added to the relation on my inventory list. When the time comes I'll convert the 'site' relation to a 'proper' one. These walls haven't budged for 2000 years so it is not in any hurry. ;o)

ciao

weblink incl app at https://www.freeto-x.it
capacity 4

How to blow up the most expensive part of your e-car, the lithium battery, in 10-15 minutes, but your pedaggio is refunded.

ciao

Hi,

This building / relation has some issues, the change set summary already showing 3 warning. Most importantly though, how did this building rise to layer=5 (somewhere floating in the stratosphere ;o). For sure, one roundish building overlaps the square building, likely needing redrawing of the square to follow the outline of the round and removing the layer=5 and tag the roundish 1 as layer=1

If you navigate in OSM Inspector in the Areas view to this location you see there are quite a few issues.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?lon=11.33603&lat=44.520912&zoom=11

Just so you know, the intersection the easiest to fix. The problem results in no building rendering there at all.

Let me know if you need help

ciao

Hi,

Please be aware that when you combine edits in far apart places, every mapper in between gets to see this edit listed in their local change set history for days. In this case some edit in Italy and another in Egypt. Try to avoid this, keep edits to a local area, save tem, then move to another place and make edits, save them, and so on.

All mappers only want to see change sets listed in their regular area of mapping.

Many thanks in advance for your consideration.

ciao

Hi,

Welcome to OSM. On your (MTB) tracks,

1) please make sure to connect the ends to other ways as else routing is impossible.

2) Don't map 1 way on top of another way that already was there.

Happy mapping

Ciao,

Benvenuto in OSM. Sulle tue tracce (MTB),

1) assicurati di collegare le estremità ad altri modi, altrimenti il ​​​​instradamento è impossibile.

2) Non mappare una via sopra un'altra che già c'era.

Buona mappatura

Hi, the immediate problem of the meadow was fixed. Looking at relation/3598469#map=12/44.5170/11.8048 it seems there are currently no broken relations with the large farmland, so not fixing what's not broken ;O)

ciao

Hi,

The problem persists, there's farmland mapped inside a greater farmland relation but the Stazione Radioastronomica di Medicina has now changed from inner to outer as it no longer is 360 enclosed by the same farmland relation, so I've changed the latter's meadow outline as temp fix. Fortunately this is just farmland and not forest as that would have given some interesting render results in Carto.

cheers