Misspelled, Bludiesel it says at the nozzle. The list shows only something like GTM or GTS:diesel but that's a Shell brand. Someone needs to add it to the dropdown list. Also there's at Eni/Agip super senza piombo octane100. only octane 95 and 98 is in the list. Quite a few stations supply octane100 at 'Gasoline' under the Super Extreme label. Agip converts station to the ENI brand and makes them unattended under the marks Eni Iperself. Labelled one station at Via Circuito, since I cycled by yesterday and noted it was no longer called Agip.
Let me know, proselytize knowledge.
cheers.

For discussion if you want, tagged this kiosk with forum threat, which denotes that building areas that are shop need not be tagged with a POI too, they render in fact with double icons.
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/22962/should-i-use-pois-or-areas-to-identify-shops

Impressive piece of layered drawing and merging into a relation. Use it as reference point.

Thumb up.

Glad you catch my typos, colur, laywe... a pity the save phase does not throw these out before hitting confirm. Pescara, almost uncharted country, must have done thousands of points and tags, one single save said 120 and still only scratching the surface.

cheers

PPS Those breakwaters rendered 'filled' BTW, which is why I probably forgot.

Thx for explaining. I read the very wiki, just failed to convert the closed line to area, which I happened to discover today how-to on two tower complexes that were drawn as outlines.
Thx for taking the time.to elucidate.

PS There remain the unexplained on the seamarks and that line that runs from breakwater to beach. If you know someone who knows his way with these, kindly point the person at it.
thx again.

The single word 'correction' is meaningless. Since I drew these anew some weeks ago, what needed 'correction'. The guidelines wiki asks to be explanatory when making an edit, so others don't have to guess hat anyone did.

thx

Lol, yet it's offered in the dropdown. I'll think about it next time, maybe legacy.

Wish the top drop down list when you start a creation had more than speed, city limit and stop, no entry is another highly frequently missing sign and there are more.

Just explain to me what's wrong with the phone numbers I enter 'non standard key', no spaces. no separation signs, no international prefix. If you don't I'll likely make the mistake again and again and keep irritating you. At any rate it looks now exactly as I put it in.

BTW, what's wrong with almost everywhere the asphalt and lane counts are missing. You changed the driveway, to residential, but did not fill in these 2 tags. I try to cover all tags while editing something.
The traffic signs on max height might be wrong too now as one cannot see if the culvert was deepened. If 'everyone uses it' that must have changed.

OK See it now.and reverted.
And kindly put in your comments what you change instead of the meaningless "sistemazione...". As per the wiki that's the purpose of the field.

Thanks for the link. Had you looked up you'd seen that there was a preexisting 'dog area' in the tip. No one bothered for years and years, so I did and even drew fences, because 3 sides are low, the back side the tall riserve fence. As it stand OSM has an enormous amount of legacy to clean up. Just looking at what already was there and how it was set up a pitfall it proofs again. At any rate, changed all 3 to dog_park. It's though funny to observe cycling by each time, dog in the park, owner in car playing with the inseparable cellulare.
cheers

One final note, the GPS trace I took on 200801 including where the approximate fence points were align very well with via Pantini. The park outline seems to be quite a bit off, like 5 meters or more the sat imaging suggests. Cosmetics to most.I suppose

OK went ahead and drafted in the 3 areas without touching the bigger area outline, just lower streetside fence and raised the backside ones. The 4 area I've not qualified.

PS not seen an access to that 4th area, it's just wild.

Where you repaired the relation there's 2 more dog areas adjacent extending all the way to the buildings at the bend of Romualdo. Had it on my list to add, but maybe you'd like to do that keeping the relations in tact. The fence road side and separators are about 1 meter and the original 2 meter park fence was moved in, same as the first dog area. Thusly, it's not clear to me if the dog areas are part of the park. Anyway that situation is as long as I've been cycling by in the past 8 years, and nobody has bothered.

cheers

Just my 2nd comment that landed in the wrong thread without a delete option, but there's a relation, those 'tags' I mentioned in my first comment and 3rd comment. Hands-off, unless "fino a prova contraria", and then, communicate first and not as has happened on the SS5, JDI when all the road signs along the way are still saying SS5.

Someone messing with tags as a result breaking a relation.

The relational routing is broken. Click on relation/31311 and you'll see the subject section is MIA.

Just an observation, no critique or contention: That seems to be a frequent issue at OSM, ... relations. Think that those who want to create the relation have to create a new one and tag them appropriately, rather than changing/deleting existing tags of which the person doing the relational work has no oversight of the implication for e.g. route mappers. Walked into 'Should' and 'Why' and someone wanting to remove a bunch of tags because it suited him, then relationally tagged a piece of cycle track and left it entirely without 'what kind, how wide, inclination, lit, etc'. There's no 'should' in my vocabulary, this is a real big volunteers project.
cheers