OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
123806636

Even if that was meant for description tag, that url shouldn't go there. Description field should be self-sufficient. If that url ever changes, the description would be useless..

123806636

Inscription on the monument is a website url to a local newspaper?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123806636

123782668

It's probably better to map city hall and police as separate nodes.. That would allow you add relevant details to each node individually rather than intermixed..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123782668

123780524

This combination of tags is intended specifically for indoor mapping, like malls or buildings.
Here it appears to be an elevator to a train/subway platform? If so then it should be tagged as highway=elevator with additional relevant tags as documented in highway=elevator 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123780524

123780189

It looks like that small grass triangle has some monument in it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123780189

123742577

Hello.
I noticed a number of other tomtom editors perform similar edits. Are they done purely for visual aspect or does this somehow affects routing?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123742577

123737014

Hello.
description= tag is intended to provide a brief information about a feature, it's not intended for promotional or advertising messaging(such as history of its founders). description=*
Also, it would be better if you tried to format phone numbers as documented in phone=*, ie separate them either with space or -, no ( ) symbols. 👍🙂
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123737014

123700257

Ah, you fixed it in the following edit. 👍🙂
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123700257

123700257

A gate the length of the whole block? That doesn't seem correct...🤔
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123700257

123667929

The way you mapped it is not wrong, just _in my opinion_ needlessly complicated. When making changes to features one have to remember to make some changes to the relation and some to the underlying ways..Sometimes when you delete a way it brakes the relation in some way, etc.. Where as if it were a single polygon with another way for a fence with gate nodes on it, it's straight forward to edit each.
Again it's not wrong to map it your way, just don't see the significant benefit of such added details vs the complexity that relations bring w/ them. 🙂

123673986

I don't remember seeing hinges and latches there. I'll go tomorrow to double check.
I've never seen this being used as a gate during any of the events I've ever been in the area. Not as an entrance nor exit. Likely originally when this whole area was being constructed they were planning to do it, but afaik it's never been used as gates. That whole section behind the fence is locked off. I've never seen anybody there.

123670718

Hello.
Is "Power line Grass Path" actually the name of this power line?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123670718

123672930

Also way/1078935696 is not a building but a ticket gate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123672930

123672930

This is rather misleading edit creating all those ways. The whole area is a completely open space.

Also why did you remove all the cuisine tags from Nathans? It is what they serve taken directly from their menu signs.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123672930

123667929

Why did you map this as a relation?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123667929

123666050

Hello.
OSM can not contain space in them. In this case it should be "happy_hours".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123666050

123656479

Hello.
As documented on abandoned=*: the use of "abandoned=yes" is discouraged, and it stead it better to use abandoned: lifecycle prefix. It would be great if you updated these tags.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123656479

123628526

I'm in Brooklyn.
I thought that healthcare=laboratory wasn't intended for publicly accessible locations, but I was wrong. According to healthcare=laboratory your edit is fine.

123628793

If you know the location of each section, you could consider mapping them as well like in this cemetery way/1067214883
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123628793

123628544

Generally roads inside of public cemeteries have "access=permissive", ie anybody is welcome unless you get kicked out.
access=permissive. And often it's also "bicycle=no", although maybe not in every case.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123628544