If you think other info should be removed, I'm not against it. It was just something that I quickly did when I saw the article of them shutting down and wanted to do it before I forget.

I used EveryDoor to mark it is closed and that's how it does it.

(Also 3 month after a comment is rather long time... Can make a lot of mistakes in that time without addressing them...😓)

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete the primary "amenity=restaurant" tag from The Milton in this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181167338

Hello.
While your edit is not wrong, instead of changing "amenity=fast_food" into "disused:shop=yes", you could've just make it "disused:amenity=fast_food".👍
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181207359

Hello.
To tag a business as closed, it's not enough to just delete its name, since that would look like an open business just nobody added its name... It's best to use "disused:" lifecycle prefix as documented on disused:=**
I fixed up these for you. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181193875

Why go digging up 3-year old changeset? 🤨
My stance on spammers hasn't changed. If these seo companies want to contribute to OSM they have to do it correctly, not half-ass it and leave it to us to clean up.

If they are not punished to submit the correct data, we'll forever be fixing it🫤

Shouldn't have wasted your time fixing this seo spam😉
If they want to add stuff to OSM, force them to do it right or we'll forever be fixing it for them.

After I go through a given route's stops, I just use https://relatify.monicz.dev to add them and ways into that route relation and the app takes care of putting everything in the correct order :)

According to the official MTA GTFS feed, BM5 line has only 2 routes 😏.
If you watched NYC's changeset feed, you've seen I've been spending a ton of time massaging bus lines into a proper shape... Adding and updating bus stops and routes with proper tags. So far I've been doing just Brooklyn since I'm most familiar with my boro. But I do know that Queens and the Bronx will require a lot of work to get them updated.
I've been using https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/US/NY/US-NY-MTA-Analysis.html and going one route at a time. (Overpass server errers haven't been helping either 😞)

So you claim you have a beauty shop in Salt Lake City and DJ in NYC? That sounds a bit questionable.
Do note that if you continue to add SEO spam to OSM you account will be flagged to Data Working Group, which can result in temporary or permanent ban.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180642725

So you claim you have a beauty shop in Salt Lake City and DJ in NYC? That sounds a bit questionable.
Do note that if you continue to add SEO spam to OSM you account will be flagged to Data Working Group, which can result in temporary or permanent ban.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180644678

Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit?
If this relation is not up to the specs of PTv2, rather than downgrading its version, it's better to correct it to be up to the spec of the current version.

Having said that, I'm not sure if this relation is needed at all. BM5 line has only 2 routes, and they are already mapped in relation/20411634 and relation/20320063

Hello.
What is the source of this information?

I think it's been brought up before, but the "memorial" name doesn't seem the best choice when such features (and not always streets) are sometimes named after living people and sometimes not even people. Perhaps "dedication" name is a better word.

I'm not questioning your sources.
And I know that prefix tag is in some use, but I'm generally against about mapping features before they physically exist. My concern is that if the tags aren't updated later, we're left with inaccurate, stale data on the map. If the plan is to remember to update it once it's built, it's better to just hold off and map it accurately when it actually exists on the ground.

OSM is a map of the world NOW. Not how it was in the past or undetermined point in the future. We shouldn't be cluttering the map with things that don't exist, and might not ever exist. Once this signal is actually there then by all means map it. But while it's only proposed, and not even planned or approved, it shouldn't be on OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179921700

Thank you.☺️
Better late than never, but late is not that great😉

Hello.
Please note that every single tag that you added in this changeset is invalid.
This whole changeset will be reverted in full.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173069999