Changeset When Comment
165951264

If I remember correctly, some of those overpasses had different height signs for different lanes because of archways. Maybe not this specific, but some in the area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165951264

165941516

Are those legitimately "no sidewalk" in a legal sense or would it be sidewalk with different surface like "grass"? Because these disconnected segments are useless for pedestrian routing...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165941516

165918148

Hello.
As mentioned in your previous edit, phone numbers can't contain ( ) and websites must have http:// or https://.
If you are tagging "credit_card" and "debit_card", tagging mastercard and visa is redundant.

What is the name and address of the added convenience store?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165918148

165917953

Hello.
Please note that as documented on phone=* phone numbers should be separated only by - or space, not ( ) or any other characters.
Additionally, website urls must contain http:// or https:// as appropriate.
What is the meaning of "branch=Provided" tag?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165917953

165906618

Hello.
Please note under any circumstances you CAN NOT use Google maps to add data to OSM. This is a copyright violation and breaking Terms of Service that you agreed to with OSM and Google.

The address and location on their website is not the same what you added. Their location is in Manhattan in The Chrysler Building. You added POI in Brooklyn.

165849909

It should be made such๐Ÿ™‚ and with anything else that has multiple locations.
That's the point of that tag

165906618

Hello.
Please provide some supporting evidence that this business is actually at this location?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165906618

165905364

Hello.
Good attempt at fixing this๐Ÿ˜…, but in OSM values are always in the lower case (Other than proper names).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165905364

165904645

Hello.
I noticed that you tagged these crosswalks as crossing:island=yes. Note that crosswalks should be tagged like that if the crossing island is included in the that way. If crossing islands are mapped as separate ways, then the crosswalks should be mapped as crossing:island=no.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165904645

165901045

Opps. Sorry.๐Ÿ˜…I didn't see that you fixed it in the very next changeset.๐Ÿ‘
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165901045

165901045

Hello.
A reminder that "incline=up/down" is an invalid tag value. It's either up OR down. It can't be both at the same time.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165901045

165900952

Hello.
Please note that handrails=metal is not a valid OSM tag. Please see handrail=* how to properly tag information regarding handrails.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165900952

165870842

Hello.
Please note the way you mapped this building is incorrect. This building outline is already properly mapped in way/264624898
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165870842

165849909

Hello.
I think it would be more accurate to have name of "Brooklyn Public Library" and add "branch=Kings Highway" to disambiguate this specific location.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165849909

165833797

Hello.
Please note that "owner=" and "private=" are both invalid OSM tags.
In OSM we don't record is owns property. This is not what OSM is about.
You can indicate who's the primary operator/maintainer of a given feature using operator= tag as documented on operator=*
And if you want to indicate that this feature is accessible only by certain people, please use access= tag as documented on access=*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165833797

165827675

Should their websites be updated too?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165827675

165827157

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete both buildings here when all the available satellite imagery shows that this building is still here?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165827157

165653979

If you are not sure about the specific shape, it's probably better to map them as a node instead.

165809835

Hello.
Could you please explain why did you delete address from a building here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165809835

165801865

Hello.
what is this link?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165801865