Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete amenity=place_of_worship tag here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166106347

Hello.
This feature is already tagged as disused:shop=e-cigarette, there's no need to add shop=vacant.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166091096

Hello.
Please do not put feature's description as its name.
Additionally, amenity=fixme is an invalid tag.
Finally, this area is already mapped as a construction site. There's no need to add duplicate data.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166091095

Hello.
There's no need to update tiger:*= tags. They are leftover from the original data import and not used for anything else. They can even be deleted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166090355

Hello.
Please note that name_1= is an invalid tag and should never be used. we have osm.wiki/Tag:name=, osm.wiki/Tag:alt_name=, osm.wiki/Tag:official_name=, and many other documented on osm.wiki/Names.
But any tag that's in the format of _1= or osm.wiki/Tag:_2=, etc are incorrect.
Please update your changes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166090178

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you add empty nodes to 3 sidewalks here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166077332

Hello.
It looks like you split a crosswalk into 2 separate ones with a refuge island in between. But then you still included crossing:island=yes on both crosswalks. That doesn't seem correct...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166075622

I think you were correct regarding that crosswalk. When I looked at that spot in Esri I didn't see it, but when I zoomed out a bit it showed up. I think that's what tripped me up. But it's also close to where I live so I'll confirm it later today.

And you are correct regarding cycleway:crossing:markings tag as well. Some of these OSM tags feel like shoehorned solutions. 😵‍💫

Are we talking about the same road segment here?🤨
It's way/208824127, diagonal, 1-way segment of Sheepshead Bay Road, connecting Ave Z and E14th. There's 1 lane of parked cars on the right, and 1 lane of moving traffic. I don't see how you can fit 3 cars there.
Here's also a photo of what I see from the satellite imagery https://imgur.com/a/IaR6uFW

Logical sense is what makes that situation different.
Mapping landuse= over areas which already have higher detailed features mapped is duplicated and wasted efforts. All the necessary information can be derived from these higher detailed features.
Blindly mapping something without fully understand why that is being mapped is not a good approach to mapping. You need to understand what and why you map something.

It's really unnecessary to map these landuse areas when all the buildings inside are already mapped. landuse information can be inferred from the building types.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166046420

Hello.
Please do not tag curbs just for the hell of it without performing actual in-person survey. It's virtually impossible to tell from the satellite imagery whether a curb is lower or not.
However, on a bunch of curbs here you tagged them as tactile_paving=no when you can clearly see red plastic bumper plates.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166045877

Also, you tagged crossing:island=no on a kerb..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166039176

Hello.
Are you sure those kerbs inside of kbcc are lowered? Satellite imagery doesn't show that.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166039176

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you add way/1384807804 when there's no crosswalk there?

For way way/1083318697 you added "footway:crossing:markings=zebra". I don't think that's a thing...🤔
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166006477

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag these crosswalks as uncontrolled, when there are clearly visible traffic signals?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165986656

Yes, please re-think that strategy. Most changes should be geographically localized. There's no reason for a single changeset to delete random nodes all over the world.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165966809

Hello.
You added a path way/1384488745 and tagged with surface=plastic. Is that accurate?
You also tagged a building as being 13 meters in height. What is the source of that information?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165963741

Hello.
Please note, when adding street names of features, they should be fully spelled out, not abbreviated. You can read more about this at osm.wiki/Abbreviations
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165960077

Hello.
Are you sure this is 30' wide? It seems to be 2-2.5cars wide, so would be ~20'
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165959951