Hi, I noticed you've selected 'review requested' on all of your changesets? You seem to be a very experienced editor, this tag is for people who would like their changesets to be checked by others. Is that the case with all of these?

This is an experimental import to see if the quality of data is good enough and to see what conflation is needed between existing landuse, barriers and boundaries etc.

Well, I think car dealerships are in a unique place in regards to brand tagging. We don't really have first party dealerships, they are dealer networks for example Holden Group. So is the brand Holden Group and they sell Kias as a product, or is the brand Kia and Holden Group is the operator as is tagged here? I don't know of any other poi/shop type that has a similar situation going on.

Hi, when you are adding terraced houses, such as way/1533687272, they should be connected to their neighbours. Thanks.

Please make sure to split buildings where they are semidetached houses or terraced houses, for example way/1533717922. Some of the footprints you have accepted are wonky or do not include the full building area such as way/1533717931. Thanks.

way/112840201 has brand:wikidata the same as not:brand:wikidata?

according to the wiki, highway=unclassified is for 'minor public roads'. These are clearly not that. The fact they are named or part of a bus/taxi route does not affect the highway classification. They do not serve through traffic, they are only for the exclusive use of the Boring Company.

That's not strictly true. The only vehicles that can use these roads are Teslas operated by the Boring Company. You cannot pay to drive on these roads. You can only pay to be a passenger in a vehicle. It is a form of highway=busway, these are not tagged access=customers.

I realised this was there before you made your changes, I have left a comment for the original mapper too.

Hi, it's not correct to add addr:housenumber=???. If it's unknown, just leave the field blank. Please also make sure to write an informative changeset comment, 'various changes' isn't useful for showing what a changeset is doing at a glance.

Hi, if you do not know the housenumber, please leave it blank rather than entering '???', thanks.

Hi, this meadow really isn't very good way/1524905629. None of the edges correspond to any real life boundaries like walls, roads or any other landuse, and it encloses a number of non-meadow areas like residential, campsites, scrub and even smaller meadow areas.

This relation should not exist - please see osm.wiki/Relations_are_not_categories

Is this the correct location? It's located inside a self storage shop

Restored in changeset/184410364 :)

Hi Chris, I marked the buildings here way/1490879483 as demolished because they looked to be that way on Bing and Esri imagery - if they are new houses and aren't on imagery yet I can restore them.

Hi, yes, the tagging I have used here is standard. man_made=geoglyph is used when letters, symbols or imagery has been created that is only visible from above. I have also mapped it as building parts for the purpose of 3D mapping, as the building's roof has been painted. You can see the result of that here: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.4905590&lon=0.0719012&zoom=20&camera.theta=54.167&camera.phi=-17.762. I have done a lot of 3D mapping in a similar vein where there are designs or words on rooves, you can see that here :) @LordGarySugar/diary/407159

Hi, I noticed you modified the give way sign here node/1547130153, you have placed the highway=give_way tag on a node that is the intersection of three directions, so it's not clear which direction the sign applies to. The correct approach would be to have the sign shortly before the junction, facing the way the sign faces. Thanks.

Hi there, welcome to OSM! It's great to see lots of missing shops and housenumbers getting filled in! I've had a look over all your changesets and made some minor tweaks/typo/capitalisation fixes but overall everything looks good! I would ask, that when drawing buildings, use 'Q' to square the corners, this will make the geometry a lot neater and will be more accurate :).
If you have any questions, I would be more than happy to answer them!

Hi, thanks for these additions! Filling in missing buildings is much appreciated. I would suggest that as these are all semidetached houses, they should each be split into two connected building=semidetached_house polygons. This will allow people adding addresses to easily assign each address to each house individually. Where the street is very uniform like this, it might be easiest just to draw one pair and copy and paste it repeatedly up the street. Hope this is helpful.