Are you manually reviewing these edits? For example here you changed highway=serfice to highway=unclassified

I've deleted this as it's clearly fictional

Hi, thanks for adding this! If you switch to Esri imagery in the iD editor, you'll see that it's much newer, but lower resolution. I've added the roads and building shape I could make out from it.

Hi, the geoglyph sections were tagged with building:part as they are painted on the roof of the building and can be represented as part of the building. You can see how the building appears in 3D here: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=-39.0588860&lon=174.0716730&zoom=21
For that reason, I've reverted your changes in changeset/180654160 to be consistent with other geoglyph mapping. Hope that's ok.

I've just seen in your other comment that you're mapping on mobile - it would be best to find a dedicated mobile editor such as Vespucci. iD is not designed for touchscreen use, so I don't know if it would be possible to follow the advice I've given above.

Hi, I saw your post on the forums and came to check out the missing buildings in Northampton. It's great to see you making a start on filling in the gaps, but there's a couple of things you need to do quality-wise.
The first is making sure that terraced and semidetached houses are connected to their neighbouring buildings, there shouldn't be gaps between them.
The second thing is squaring the buildings you've mapped with 'Q', this will make them more accurate and will look better. You can also select a row of connected houses and square them all together.
Any questions feel free to ask, thanks!

Здравствуйте, пожалуйста, не отображайте здания в виде треугольников. Геометрия должна соответствовать зданию, показанному на аэрофотоснимках.

Hi, please do not map buildings as triangles. The geometry should match the building shown on aerial imagery.

Hey, this changeset converted lots of redundant multipolygons into simple ways, I didn't add anything new or change any tags in this changeset. It's a plugin being actively developed by watmildon, so it was a reference to the fact it's not quite perfect yet. One issue is that it doesn't always preserve the history, which is why lots of these ways are version 1. Any cleanup of the mapping here as you suggested is welcome, I didn't notice the riding arenas were tagged wrongly here. I have been meaning to do a review of the mapping here but haven't got round to it yet. Hope that's all ok, thanks!

It's not correct to add a place=locality node with name "Iranian attack site". Removed.

Are there really monoral railway tracks here? What did you intend to represent with them?

Why? Reverted. changeset/180610861

Restored in changeset/180481933

Hi, just a note to say we can't use Google Street View for mapping, or other copyrighted maps osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps

Hey, thanks for adding these buildings and housenumbers!

Some tips for mapping houses:
- each house in a terrace should be traced individually, similarly semidetached houses should be two connected buildings. You can enable 'OSMUK cadastral parcels' in background settings to highlight property boundaries and make this easier.
- use Q to square buildings, this will make them more accurate and will look better

Thanks for contributing, if you have any questions feel free to ask!

I have created a forum thread to discuss your recent deletions of buildings, roads and other pois within the Gaza Strip, it would be appreciated if you would engage there with your rationale and methodology when making these changes. Thanks. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-deletion-of-buildings-roads-and-pois-in-gaza-strip/142540

I've reverted all changes to the Mancunian Way following community discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-we-prioritise-official-truth/142448
Changeset: changeset/180221456

Agreed, reverted in changeset/180220049. Thanks @kitsee for the source

Makes sense, thanks 👍

Thanks, fixed now, with an obvious typo such as this you are welcome to go ahead and make the correction yourself

Making this change is incorrect - if the road is signed as an A road, it's an A road. By changing the road to a motorway, you are implying that certain traffic types cannot be routed here, for example learner drivers, when in reality they are allowed to drive along this road. Maxspeed should also reflect the signage on the ground, not whatever historic document you are citing.