OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
178889060

a proč to tam stále (a nejen tady) cpete jako railway:signal:speed_limit ? Tohle je samostatná návěst (značka) ale tady je to součást návěstidla, hm?

178889002

a dál ještě ... ?

178889002

Ono by to chtělo také správně popsat návěstidla staničních kolejí, teda aby to dávalo smysl.

178889078

Co je jasně popsané? V tom dodatečně slepeném podvodném a podvrženém článku "Original tagging ..."? :D Je to pouze snůška chaotických popisů, bez nějaké logické struktury.

176615511

This can also occur. It is a problem of delay between the actual state and imaging.
But where is the basis for the newly mapped road? The one that is being prepared?

178889002

Ale to s tabulkou návěstidla až tak nesouhlasí :D

178889002

a jejda, někdo nepochopil, kdy se používá drážní značka "návěstidlo sloučeno s předvěstí" (Cs:Key:railway:signal:minor), to je stejné jako se substitute_signal, jo, popis značek "railway:signal:stop" je také špatně.

178889095

ano, ten pás tam takový skutečně je, škoda, že stejná všímavost není použita i jinde

178889078

to je právě následek toho, že si někdo neumí pořádně přečíst nápovědu, kde je vysvětleno, co je substitute signal, pro ty méně chápavé tam je i obrázek ... This is precisely the result of someone not being able to properly read the help section, where it explains what a substitute signal is. For those who are less quick on the uptake, there is also a picture.Cs:Tag:railway%3Dsignal#railway:signal:*:substitute_signal ...

178889095

je to špatně popsané, to je vše

178889060

to je právě ten problém, že si někdo stále plete co je světlo (to co ve tmě vydává nějakou barvu) a to, co je nesvítí a je vyrobeno z plechu nebo plastu a je stejně tvrdé ...

177696168

see talk:Mueschel

170722953

ahoj, ty odstavné koleje za budovou železničního musea jsou nové nebo už vykopané? od vyhybky 8 a 12

177167175

@fiascoi ... Anas is the main one who claims to be the best, and the others agree with him, according to a Czech proverb.

177167175

add ... Or at least rewrite a critical article about mistakes and shortcomings on Wiki pages in a way that suits the other side.

177167175

@ALL Yes, the best way to get rid of opposition is to eliminate it. This is the classic method of autocratic rule in practice, where weak individuals feel strong under the wing of their ruler.

177167175

@Anas ... Sure, you can report it. As for the discussion, you yourself are shutting it down with various excuses and attacks. You claim that you are the best and that you know everything. Can you prove it somehow? Is there any discussion about your primacy? You see, it's exactly the same. You yourself are committing similar attacks by placing yourself above others, thereby claiming that others are stupid and only you are smart. If you are talking about a discussion of my proposal, where is the discussion about editing methods from fiasco? Hmm????

177167175

@fiasco ... Who said you should add, rewrite, or correct anything? In your arrogance, you rewrote parts of the text to suit your opinion.

177167175

@Anas ... Your response expresses nothing but arrogance and unwillingness to accept other, and above all better, solutions. You have been living with the old system for a long time, and accepting a new or better method would mean admitting you were wrong. You are clearly incapable of doing that. And one more thing... what a coincidence, you happened to notice something? That's a lame excuse. You were warned to join the majority, unfortunately the one that is incapable of modernization and active change.
I don't care if they have it described differently or the same way in DE, PL, AT, those are their railways.
Have you really read all the traffic regulations of the neighboring states you mention? And have you understood them? That's really surprising, because it takes a lot of time, but you wrote that you can't answer because you have to work.

177167175

@fiasco: What you write is simply untrue. There are many of my answers and explanations on the wiki discussion page. On the contrary, your unwillingness and attitude of repeating the same questions, your misunderstanding of the structure of signals, and your lack of cooperation have led to this situation. You seem to have forgotten that I corrected some things based on your comments and those of vrabcak. The fact that I did not correct everything offended you, in your opinion. In specific cases, I acknowledged my mistake or error and corrected it. You are unable to do so, like a small child.