@vrabcak: User Anas initiated the personal attack with false accusations that I am not communicating. Will you send him a warning as well? On the contrary, Anas still hasn't answered some questions.

@fiasko I spent over a year creating the description on the wiki, no one had any objections, and you had plenty of time to submit suggestions. As I expected, you settle scores through third parties (Anas).

Add 2, @Anas... why haven't you answered yet? You claim above that I don't want to communicate, but you remain silent and don't answer!!!

Add 3, @Anas... do you have the SZDC-D1 regulation in front of you on your desk? And do you understand it? Probably not. It's just your empty and manipulative phrase. If you understand it, you should have answered in Czech. If you can read Czech regulations, you must know Czech, otherwise you have again stated something untrue and it is fraud.

Add 2, @Anas... why haven't you answered yet? You claim above that I don't want to communicate, but you remain silent and don't answer!!!

Add 3, @Anas... do you have the SZDC-D1 regulation in front of you on your desk? And do you understand it? Probably not. It's just your empty and manipulative phrase. If you understand it, you should have answered in Czech. If you can read Czech regulations, you must know Czech, otherwise you have again stated something untrue and it is fraud.

add @Anas ... One more question: who approved and agreed to the description of signals based on the "fiasco" model? My method was and is to first create a diagram and then use it consistently. Fiasco did not do this, he just started creating descriptions. As you write, your words... not agreed upon.

add @Anas ... One more question: who approved and agreed to the description of signals based on the "fiasco" model? My method was and is to first create a diagram and then use it consistently. Fiasco did not do this, he just started creating descriptions. As you write, your words... not agreed upon.

@vrabcak. v popisu návěstidla, např. railway:signal:main=Cs-D1:L1 je to bez mzery, ano, ref píšu s mezerou abych lépe viděl které návěstidlo jsem opravil, Pro renderování se dá mezera vypustit (vyjmout). Jistě, pokud to bude nutné, může to být i bez ní.

1) Old schemas are mostly duplicates of tags; among other things, they allow incorrect descriptions to be assigned to otherwise correctly described signals.
2) On the contrary, the repairs are in accordance with D1. The regulations for Polish railways are different and cannot be confused.
3) Did Detective-fiasko have any description template approved for Czech railways? Without creating any example for Cs, he began copying inappropriate signage from other countries.
4) What lack of response? Have we ever corresponded? You are clearly trying to exert pressure and gain an advantage. What you are writing about mutual communication is a complete lie and untrue. Fiasco probably asked you to defend his mistakes in creating descriptive diagrams.
5) Railway regulations vary from country to country, not all aspects can be directly applied, but correctly filled object tags are sufficient for describing signals and their rendering for ORM; there is no need to invent duplicate descriptions such as "CZ-D1:hlavni_navestidlo" ... This is directly given by the description of the "railway:signal:main" tag, which is standard.

Your comment that they do not communicate is clearly provocative and an attack on other editors.

1) Old schemas are mostly duplicates of tags; among other things, they allow incorrect descriptions to be assigned to otherwise correctly described signals.
2) On the contrary, the repairs are in accordance with D1. The regulations for Polish railways are different and cannot be confused.
3) Did Detective-fiasko have any description template approved for Czech railways? Without creating any example for Cs, he began copying inappropriate signage from other countries.
4) What lack of response? Have we ever corresponded? You are clearly trying to exert pressure and gain an advantage. What you are writing about mutual communication is a complete lie and untrue. Fiasco probably asked you to defend his mistakes in creating descriptive diagrams.
5) Railway regulations vary from country to country, not all aspects can be directly applied, but correctly filled object tags are sufficient for describing signals and their rendering for ORM; there is no need to invent duplicate descriptions such as "CZ-D1:hlavni_navestidlo" ... This is directly given by the description of the "railway:signal:main" tag, which is standard.

*kde předpokládám, že umístění SUBTITUTE je dostatečně znázorněno.

@ detective-fiasco zájem-nezájem, několikrát jsem vysvětlil rozdíl mezi náhradní návěstí a přivolávací návěstí. Je to popsáno i v D1 a rozdíl pro jízdu vlaků není velký. Ten rozdíl je v tom, že SUBSTITUTE je instalována DOČASNĚ (přenosná) ale PŘIVOLÁVACÍ je integrována do sloupce světel TRVALE. Pro názornost máme i obrázek osm.wiki/Cs:Tag:railway%3Dsignal#railway:signal:*:substitute_signal, kde předpokládám, že je SUBSTITUTE nakreslena, kde se umisťuje.

Dobrý den, substitute_signal je zástupná návěst, když návěstidlo nefunguje a instaluje se dodatečně. PN je návěst, která je integrována přímo do sloupce světel (např, jízda na obsazenou kolej). Tady nejde o to, že bych PN nechtěl, ale o to, že PN není zástupná návěst, která tam normálně není instalována. Zástupná návěst se instaluje až při poruše návěstidla. Stejně tak nemá význam mapovat ostatní ruční, přenosné návěsti a značky, které se umisťují dočasně.

ok, thx

Ahoj, co je zde za návěstidlo? Pozice: 50,0233127, 16,8967862

Pokud by to chtěl někdo opravdu řešit, tak relace budou přiřazeny části nástupiště, koleje a místa zastavení, kde bude čelo vlaku.

Tak dlouhé vlaky už v česku nejezdí. :D

Ahoj, nejsem prvním autorem nástupišť ale je to tak, že nástupiště jsou propojena s dopravními relacemi. Ze severní části se jezdí například do Děčína (jedna relace) a z jižní části se jezdí do Budějic. Takže celé nástupiště je rozděleno na dvě části podle směru dopravních relací. V místě rozdělení jsou umístěna i cestová (Lc) návěstidla tak, aby na jedné koleji mohly proti sobě stát dva vlaky, každý s následným odjezdem do jiného směru.

Hallo, ich habe keine Informationen für „supercharger süd“. Es ist ein 3 Jahre altes Mapping. Der heutige Stand kann anders sein.

Thank you, fixed.

ok

Okay, is it any better?