Hi. Outdated images are always a problem. Then there are collisions because the images don't have a creation date. I don't know how to undo it, there are a lot of changes. Wouldn't it be better to wait for new images or manually fix major changes?

It's possible, a mistake was made. But the old version may not correspond to the position of the line, etc.

ignore you

@SomeoneElse ... to se někdo probudil po měsíci :) pak nedělá nic jiného, než že jedná jako pravý troll :D a řeší již vyřešené ;)

Ahoj, nejsem tvůj pes aby si mi dával rozkazy. Vzkazy ani nečtu každý den a popravdě, ukaž jak umíš precizně editovat ty. Zde jsi nevytvořil ani jednu novou čáru, nový objekt. Tak se neptej jak se rozhodují jiní a jdi první s vzorovým příkladem.

Hi, yes, I know. But it's the eternal contradiction of what takes precedence. Whether visibility of objects (that actually exist) on the map for general users (not editors) or whether to accept the imperfection of rendering. Which is right and which is better? Human or artificial intelligence?

The sessions were transferred from the contour to the platform area.
If the shelter and platform is not designed as a multipolygon, the shelter is not displayed.

The sessions were transferred from the contour to the platform area.
If the shelter and platform is not designed as a multipolygon, the shelter is not displayed.

If you can't pinpoint "my alleged mistake", your comment is just an arrogant attack on other editors. In other words, it's trolling. Your comment is further considered insignificant and will not be accepted.
Stop attacking and slandering other editors.

Without a specific line, discussion is pointless.

Hi
I don't know exactly which is the side road, the specific line. But it's based on aerial photography, which may be outdated. Other street photography has those tracks there as well.

I'll be stopping by in a few days, so hopefully there will be somewhere relevant to park according to the OSM map :) We are going to visit the invasion beach landing l anniversary.

Hi, I'm responding with a delay, the notification of comments to the email doesn't work. You can fix it, it's not a problem. Have a nice day

Ahoj, bohužel to nemohu na ploše najít. Možná chyba nebo omyl.

Ok

Duplicita? Hlavním prvkem je ulice / ulička. Tyto cesty ale nejsou sjízdné, protože zde jsou chody "na ulici".

1) "At many airports, aeroway=taxiway is also used within apron areas, however". Unless the apron is divided into several smaller ones, but here the aprons are divided and the taxiway passes between them. In other words. If one huge and complete apron is drawn then the taxiway will pass through the cross. That's not here.
2) Taxilane / Parking_posirion , using Parking_position is universal (simpler), can be a point and a line.
Additionally, the help for Parking_positioin states "draw a line from the taxiway to the stopping point and mark Pakking_position". The description of Taxilane in the help is also a bit confusing because it also refers to the runway.

After your hit, half of the roofs and lawns will remain invisible on the map, half will be displayed. What's right? All rooftops and lawns exist. But according to your map, only some of them exist. Isn't that stupid?

Pedestrians don't walk on the grass here but around :D, hence the grass as a visible area.
Rendering is just solved by cutting out the area and inserting an object into it. This is common knowledge, and a good editor knows it, another editor doesn't understand it and wonders. That's why the "cut out" options exist.
If you object, at least don't destroy the maps.

node/1017848199 ... it is not a my work !!! go and FIRST READ HELP, it si bad point of other editor.
Please use your head, think logically before you destroy something. You're using arguments based on the wrong tags of a previous edit.