Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 181912073 | You may want to research the wiki for tagging dirt bikes (motorcycle) See access=*. Also be aware, many of the trails in the state do not allow motorized vehicles with some exceptions. You can also join our Slack, which I'll send you more info on, to ask the best way to tag for dirt bikes.
|
|
| 181901351 | I've update the streets back to residential and removed access=no. Let me know if you disagree.
|
|
| 181901309 | Same comments as on your first edit.
|
|
| 181901254 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Two problems, the first is access=no is not likely since this road services a number of residences. Second, living_streets are very rare in the US. You can tag the road as ownership=private. If there are posted no trespassing signs then add access=private.
|
|
| 181889498 | Looks good, not sure how the node got moved to the sidewalk so I moved in back inside of the bldg
|
|
| 181745626 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. One suggestino, the colour tag should be lower case brown.
|
|
| 181745418 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 181745169 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 181727030 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. I would recommend adding driveways as a way instead of an area. That way routers can utilize the way.
|
|
| 181610556 | Thanks for the information. I think what you want is highway=living_street. SDOT's greenway doesn't exactly fit the wiki definition of a living street, but it's close, though not the same as implemented in Europe. See highway=living_street |
|
| 181610556 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. This is a residential road, not a path. edit reverted
|
|
| 181439924 | #TIP: sometimes you just need to adjust the imagery offset. Look under the backgound layer icon in the editor. The imagery offset adjustment is towards the bottom.
|
|
| 181427645 | If this is for rent, then an appropriate tag should be added. For example tourism=motel. See tourism=motel
|
|
| 181427645 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 181387110 | Thanks for correcting the street name. From what I see, the road is tagged as private but there isn't a no trespassing sign. If that is correct, then the tagging the road ownership=private would be appropriate. Can you review this edit.
|
|
| 181335644 | Check out Mapbox Imagery or ESRI World Imagery. Not sure which is more current, but both are more current than Bing.
|
|
| 181300763 | According to the county, these look like private service roads. I'm going to change them, but feel free to let me know if you disagree.
|
|
| 181240207 | You might want to add the tag amenity=cafe to include the cafe portion of the business
|
|
| 181247135 | I think you want ownership=private. As far as I can see, there is not signs permitting use of the road. Can you review this edit?
|
|
| 181167902 | I think you want the tag landuse=grass. Grasslands are large grass fields where wildlife graze.
|