OpenStreetMap
Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 182139266 | Why is this a city wall border? There also appears to be two city wall borders. See way/1507975676 and way/167531878
|
|
| 182096163 | From imagery, it appears that the service road continues so why did you remove it? In OSM, if the object can be ground truthed, it can be added. If something is blocking traffic from using it, the blocking object should be added to the way.
|
|
| 182082495 | These appear to be service roads according to county documents. I'll send you a more info on OSM in a message. Check out the wiki page for highway classification. Can you review this edit to make sure these are actually residential or service roads?
|
|
| 182083665 | To move the admin boundary, it will need to be unglued from the street. In the iD editor (browser) select the admin boundary the hit Shift D to unglue the two linestrings. Note this can be challenging. It's we we don't recommend joining two different features. Let me know if you need help.
|
|
| 182022045 | I find it hard to believe there is a shop in the middle of the forest with no roads around. I'm going to revert this edit. I'll send you more infomation on OSM in a message.
|
|
| 181968290 | #TIP: before using information from websites, make sure that the information isn't copyrighted. Since these are mountain peak names, I'd assume the information is public.
|
|
| 181955829 | I corrected a couple of problems. the driveway to 4744 still needs the tag highway=service. Also the gate is just a node on the driveway to tell routers that there is a gate in its path
|
|
| 181912073 | You may want to research the wiki for tagging dirt bikes (motorcycle) See access=*. Also be aware, many of the trails in the state do not allow motorized vehicles with some exceptions. You can also join our Slack, which I'll send you more info on, to ask the best way to tag for dirt bikes.
|
|
| 181901351 | I've update the streets back to residential and removed access=no. Let me know if you disagree.
|
|
| 181901309 | Same comments as on your first edit.
|
|
| 181901254 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Two problems, the first is access=no is not likely since this road services a number of residences. Second, living_streets are very rare in the US. You can tag the road as ownership=private. If there are posted no trespassing signs then add access=private.
|
|
| 181889498 | Looks good, not sure how the node got moved to the sidewalk so I moved in back inside of the bldg
|
|
| 181745626 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. One suggestino, the colour tag should be lower case brown.
|
|
| 181745418 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 181745169 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 181727030 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. I would recommend adding driveways as a way instead of an area. That way routers can utilize the way.
|
|
| 181610556 | Thanks for the information. I think what you want is highway=living_street. SDOT's greenway doesn't exactly fit the wiki definition of a living street, but it's close, though not the same as implemented in Europe. See highway=living_street |
|
| 181610556 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. This is a residential road, not a path. edit reverted
|
|
| 181439924 | #TIP: sometimes you just need to adjust the imagery offset. Look under the backgound layer icon in the editor. The imagery offset adjustment is towards the bottom.
|
|
| 181427645 | If this is for rent, then an appropriate tag should be added. For example tourism=motel. See tourism=motel
|