#TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating names.

Did you send the user a message explaining why you reverted the changeset?

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

Just edit the existing road. If you notice, there is a version number for every feature. It is interesting to look at some of the features with multiple updates over time. For example, US 97, just north of the bridge over Peshastin Creek, is on version 10

OSM, because it was started in the UK, uses England's road classifications. unclassified is basically a rural residential street. If that is what it is, it's unlikely not to allow access. However, if it is privately owned and maintained, then an appropriate tag would be ownership=private. Can you review this changeset to make sure the way is properly tagged?

#TIP: when a business is just one of many in a building, just use a node for the business. Then add the address to the building.

If this is a MTB trail, I'd recommend tagging it as highway=path + bike=designated. The other tags you added are great.

highway=cycleway is what you typically find in a city or like the
Burke Gilman trail or the Centennial Trail out in the country.

By restoring the area I indended to say by removing any sign of a trail, plant the area with native plants. Even place large boulders or fallen trees across the trail.

The access=no tag is sufficient to show the paths should not be used. However, if there is still illegal usage of trails, then, ideally, the property owner should post no trespassing signs and restore the area where the trails are located.

Park staff often use this method to keep people off what is called "informal trails".

The trails were already tagged as private. What are you hoping to accomplish by adding in tags of foot, horse, bike = no? They seem redundant.

I'd recommend adding the gate, just add a node to the road where the gate is located. Tag it as barrier=gate. I'm guessing that the access for vehicles would be permissive.

Why did you tag this cycleway as access=no? That means no one can use it. Also, is this really a mountain bike trails? If so use osm.wiki/Mountain_biking to help you tag it correctly. Let me know if you need help.

Not sure what you were trying to accomplish. I removed your two sections of road. Are you trying to also add a house? if so just draw an outline around the structure then tag it with the house number, street, and city. Let me know if you need help.

It appears that someone reverted your edit. Since the driveway exists, it can be mapped. They did add your address to the house. Let me know if this is not correct. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.

We don't post personal information so I removed the Lennar Daybreak home name on both buildings.

They also seemed way too big so I made them smaller. Hopefully we'll get some updated imagery soon so you can draw them to size.

It looks like you accidentally added a duplicate road. I removed the duplicate and changed the remaining home to highway=residential.

The addr:street should be spelled out "South Grady Way" The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.

Your contribution looks good.

#TIP: use a multipolygon to create the parking lot instead of using two adjoining polygons.

Your contributions looks good. A couple of suggestions. The ponds are probably basins. They are tagged as landuse=basin + basin=detention or basin=retention.

Also - when you add a culvert, be sure to include a layer=-1. That tells the renderer that the road is over the culvert.

#TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - they will look nicer.