I would suggest adding a node in the way where the gate is located and tagging it as a gate. That way people are unlikely to remove the access=no. and instead, tag it as ownership=private.

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

We do typically add the speed limit to the street although it is okay to add a node where the sign is located.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147350383

natural=grassland is typically used for wild growing grass. Since the city maintains the park it's unlikely that it is wild grass. landuse=grass is what we use to described grass covered areas. I know it's confusing. See natural=grassland for more info. Can you review this changeset and fix the area as needed? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147349329

It appears you accidentally broke the coastline as well as dragged a node on the marina polygon. Fortunately someone fixed them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147337509

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147236174

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One #TIP: address are spelled out in OSM. The reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you fix two of the addresses you added on Beverly Boulevard? Thanks - I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147226964

#TIP: street names are spell out in OSM. The reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you expand the name? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147196685

#TIP: Instead of using a description tag, check out the wiki for the proper tag to use. See amenity=retirement_home for some options.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147197119

A couple of comments 1st - the track at Harbor Points Middle School you added a track tag to an element of a multipolygon. The actually multipolygon already has the appropriate tags. If you are not familiar with multipolygons they are a complex relations of polygons to describe a feature that has many parts. For example, a building with a open interior like an atrium. - I removed the tag.

2nd - the fountain can be made more like round object by selecting the outline, right click and select the circle icon. Give it a try. It will look much nicer.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147165229

No problem. I've added large numbers of addresses with no buildings even planned. But someday they may be.

BTW - modern routers do well with some spatial gaps, like the end of a driveway and the space to the address node or house.

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147108553

Again, add the address to the building not the road.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147070339

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: add the street, city and zip to the node. Then you don't need the note tag.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147070575

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147070694

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147070739

We typically don't added address info to roads. Instead just add a address node at the entrance to the house or building. Or if the building exists, add it to the building. Can you fix this one?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147069786

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147038196

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147038404

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146958572

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146958572