OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
106389629

Hi, thanks for the edit.
Is this retail development now open? If so the landuse=construction should be removed, and Home Bargains could be tagged as shop=variety_store.

106152225

Hi, welcome back to OSM :) Just wanted to let you know that generally the new Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment with the old Bing (which is now Esri clarity).

If you have a look at background > overlays in the editor, you can turn on "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels" to help align Bing - I used about 4,-3 in this changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=106160816

Cheers

105535179

Why have you changed this to a motorway?

105173226

Hmm, I considered deli for another refillery shop but the wiki mentions fine foods, meats, cheeses, etc.
Suppose a refillery shop is like a mini-supermarket but just with a different method of shopping for products?

100104168

Not local to WL though I do keep an eye on what's happening in OSM :)

I would say if it's expected to be changed for a decent amount of time - a few months perhaps? - and you can keep an eye out and revert it back if the speed limits return to what they were, then I'd say change them in OSM.

100104168

Hi, I noticed this road had been updated from 20 to 30mph changeset/104148939
I suspect the mapper who did it is not local as they mentioned GPS data in a reply to me: changeset/104210067
So is the road definitely 20mph?

105021467

Hi, what is your source for this edit - have you surveyed this on the ground? Because someone changed this to 20 mph last month

103933663

Hi, I'm assuming this is a factory and you can't actually buy anything from here? If so the shop tag should be removed way/81080794

102032131

Sorry for the delay. I think ctait's baseline of old Bing (which is now available as Esri clarity) seems to be fairly close to the cadastral parcels. See Allanton for example way/228795680 - needs about (1.0,-2.7) for Bing.

Your numbers for Duns seem about right, though it might be even less of an offset. At least it's not as large as some places I've seen (upwards of 3)! Just wanted to make sure you were aware :)

104637844

Hi, the path was incomplete because I couldn't see a path the last time I was up there. Have you walked the route of the path you have added?

104428432

Be careful, these roads you added are in fact paths (I've fixed them)

102032131

Not sure if you are aware but there is now a OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay in iD/JOSM to help align Bing imagery.

Only mentioning it as I noticed this building and walls are slightly out of alignment with old Bing (Esri clarity) way/924067327#map=19/55.77896/-2.29845&layers=N

Fortunately doesn't seem like the offset is that large though :-)

104537928

It may well be private land but I highly doubt that's its name, removed.

104441694

Removed that as it's clearly just a footway

104527378

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Based on the note note/2664859 I've removed the path on the west and connected the north path to Ramsey Tullis Drive.

104441694

Hi, you don't need to add foot/motor_vehicle=yes
or oneway=no tags to highway=residential as these are the implied defaults :)

104014669

Don't think you need the additional caravan/camp site nodes e.g. node/8691847446 as these are duplicates of the larger area.

104210067

Thanks for the reply, though I'm not exactly sure what you mean by the GPS analysis.

But if you are using Google Street View to see where the speed limit changes then that it is not allowed for mapping in OSM.

104215439

Can you not still access the cycleway from the road, i.e. if you use the roundabout coming from the west?

104210067

Hi, what is your source for this edit?