GinaroZ's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 106389629 | Hi, thanks for the edit.
|
|
| 106152225 | Hi, welcome back to OSM :) Just wanted to let you know that generally the new Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment with the old Bing (which is now Esri clarity). If you have a look at background > overlays in the editor, you can turn on "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels" to help align Bing - I used about 4,-3 in this changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=106160816 Cheers |
|
| 105535179 | Why have you changed this to a motorway? |
|
| 105173226 | Hmm, I considered deli for another refillery shop but the wiki mentions fine foods, meats, cheeses, etc.
|
|
| 100104168 | Not local to WL though I do keep an eye on what's happening in OSM :) I would say if it's expected to be changed for a decent amount of time - a few months perhaps? - and you can keep an eye out and revert it back if the speed limits return to what they were, then I'd say change them in OSM. |
|
| 100104168 | Hi, I noticed this road had been updated from 20 to 30mph changeset/104148939
|
|
| 105021467 | Hi, what is your source for this edit - have you surveyed this on the ground? Because someone changed this to 20 mph last month |
|
| 103933663 | Hi, I'm assuming this is a factory and you can't actually buy anything from here? If so the shop tag should be removed way/81080794 |
|
| 102032131 | Sorry for the delay. I think ctait's baseline of old Bing (which is now available as Esri clarity) seems to be fairly close to the cadastral parcels. See Allanton for example way/228795680 - needs about (1.0,-2.7) for Bing. Your numbers for Duns seem about right, though it might be even less of an offset. At least it's not as large as some places I've seen (upwards of 3)! Just wanted to make sure you were aware :) |
|
| 104637844 | Hi, the path was incomplete because I couldn't see a path the last time I was up there. Have you walked the route of the path you have added? |
|
| 104428432 | Be careful, these roads you added are in fact paths (I've fixed them) |
|
| 102032131 | Not sure if you are aware but there is now a OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay in iD/JOSM to help align Bing imagery. Only mentioning it as I noticed this building and walls are slightly out of alignment with old Bing (Esri clarity) way/924067327#map=19/55.77896/-2.29845&layers=N Fortunately doesn't seem like the offset is that large though :-) |
|
| 104537928 | It may well be private land but I highly doubt that's its name, removed. |
|
| 104441694 | Removed that as it's clearly just a footway |
|
| 104527378 | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Based on the note note/2664859 I've removed the path on the west and connected the north path to Ramsey Tullis Drive. |
|
| 104441694 | Hi, you don't need to add foot/motor_vehicle=yes
|
|
| 104014669 | Don't think you need the additional caravan/camp site nodes e.g. node/8691847446 as these are duplicates of the larger area. |
|
| 104210067 | Thanks for the reply, though I'm not exactly sure what you mean by the GPS analysis. But if you are using Google Street View to see where the speed limit changes then that it is not allowed for mapping in OSM. |
|
| 104215439 | Can you not still access the cycleway from the road, i.e. if you use the roundabout coming from the west? |
|
| 104210067 | Hi, what is your source for this edit? |