There is a discussion on note/5150062 about the route, which basically isn't signed on this west route - will Sustrans be going out to sign it?

Why have you changed these and other from dismount to yes, do they meet the criteria at: barrier=cycle%20barrier?uselang=en-GB#Standard_bicycle_access ?

Maybe shop=convenience would be better for "Shop Local"?

If the Tesco is not complete then the shop=supermarket should not yet be added :)

Thanks for going out and surveying this, I did have my suspicions as it wasn't publicised. Although, there was some traces on Strava heatmap.
I've commented on the original changeset to ask about their process.

Another mapper has surveyed this area and found the road is not open, see: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:New%20section%20of%20B9993.jpg?uselang=en-GB

I am curious how TomTom's GPS traces indicated this road was open. How many traces were there and did drivers report it as being open? What other evidence do you use before editing OSM?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I'm assuming that the smoothness=intermediate tag is now outdated and it is likely to be excellent?

Still a couple of objects on the relation so not actually deleted. Though I wonder if it should be changed to a regional route for Falkland to Newburgh?

Thanks, there's a few bits still 30mph on the map if you want to sort those :) https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2mGe

Just in case you're not aware but Mapbox satellite imagery in this area and many others is the most up to date (looks like within the past year) and has the solar farm.

I think you may be getting confused with the iD editor's placeholder values in the access field, with what is actually tagged on the footway here in the OSM data.

When you add a footway it doesn't by default add bicycle or motor_vehicle access tags. I agree cycling is prohibited but so is driving yet you've only tagged one of those modes as "no".

"But, this particular case is a bog standard pavement on which cycling is illegal."
I mean so is driving, so you should be adding motor_vehicle=no (and horse=no?) as well.

Hi, is the B9993 definitely open to traffic connecting to the A9?

Why have you changed these roads from unclassified to tertiary? And why use a changeset comment which doesn't reflect the changes?

Not sure why you decided to add a bunch of duplicate nodes for churches etc based on OS 2016 data, but I've removed them all. Please take care editing in future.

What was the reason for adding bicycle=yes to this and other footpaths?
way/243583087

Not sure why you added ref=31 to here when there's already a housenumber?

This is the only object with boundary=religious_administration tagged in the entire UK, I really don't think it is required...

This road has been reverted back to highway=primary to match Scotland's trunk road network
way/1422167264/history

When was it decided to use this tagging scheme?