Hi!
Please review the ways with highway=bus_guideway like this one:
way/533172280
This is a very special typo of road, see highway=bus_guideway
Mapbox shows ways with road markings,this would not be needed with a guided way.

Hi!
Please check my corrections for roads where you entered the name with the highway key:
changeset/53030610

I learned now that you work for the "AI-Assisted Road Tracing" project. My understanding of the wiki page is that you should not tag each way with source=* and import=yes but instead use these tags for the changeset. I think this would be much better.

OK, maybe my understanding is too poor. I've asked the UK forum for help
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=668571#p668571

Hi and welcome to OSM!
You changed a rather large area from landuse=residential to amenity=marketplace
building=yes
name=Ranen Market Centre
way/455165941
I've reverted this change, please draw a new way for the marketplace.

Since you don't seem to use one of the common prefixes to express this
what about historic=way? This is used far more often than highway=historic.

OK, that is understood. Question is what tag can be used to express this. Since there is no highway on the southern part of the bridge I wonder why you don't simple remove the highway tag.

Hi!
What means highway="path possible, but extremely dangerous" ?
way/205949005
I assume you wanted to add this as a note?

Hi!
Please check:
What is meant with import=yes used on some new ways?
They all have the tags import=yes + source=digitalglobe so it doesn't seem to be an import as described here:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Hi!
Please review 5 roads with highway=R
in this changeset. I assume you meant residential?
Why do you add import=yes to these ways? If these ways are from an import, you should mention the source of this import instead or additional to Digital Globe. In this case I assume you just use copy+paste for new ways like this
way/532981872

OK, so you think the owners still use if for walking? In that case it would be a highway=footway + access=private
or maybe hw=path, right?

Siehe changeset/52982507
Statt hw=razed könnte man auch historic=way in betracht ziehen. Die Relation
way/397631667
ist auch nicht wirklich korrekt, ist ja mehr 'ne Sammelrelation als 'ne route.

Hi!
What does the rarely used highway=historic mean on these two ways?
way/506142967
way/506142970
Maybe you want to express that the ways are no longer usable?
Please check osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix for better tags.
Or maybe it is a historic=way ?

Yes, since the sidewalk is not mapped as a separate way I think you just have to add the nodes as you suggested.

OK, thanks, Will have a look at it later.

I think I also did that in the past (but noticed it before uploading), but now I am no longer able to reproduce the problem in JOSM. If you can, please open a ticket for JOSM.

OK, thanks!

Hi!
Please watch out for typo highway=residental (missing 2nd i)
I fixed it here:
changeset/52946988

Hi!
The tag highway=historic is rarely used. Please check osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
for common tagging.

Hi!
Please review these ways tagged highway=escape. I think they are all hw=track + tracktype=grade1
One is here:
way/532543515
Why did you use hw=escape?
See also highway=escape
Why is it not connected to the ways in the west?