Hi!
I changed the unusual highway=driveway to highway=service + service=driveway, see
changeset/52946622

Hi!
I've changed highway=bridge here:
changeset/52946580

Hi!
Please review typo addr:place="<different>"
on more than 10000 objects near this area, all created by you.

Taginfo says that service=test_track is used 27 times, so I think hw=service + service=test_track is okay.

oops, sorry, meant historic=highway

Hi!
Please review unusual tag highway=historical on way/462621213 and way/441835222
Sat images don't show a highway, so they either existed a long time ago or maybe never?
In the first case I suggest historical=highway or highway=razed, in the 2nd case I think the ways should be removed.

Or maybe it is an amenity=parking?

.. at least in the northern part ;-)
Maybe you also know what this is?
way/335875843

Hi!
Please review position of this highway=secondary:
way/336091538
Current Bing shows a road next to this roughly drawn way.

I've changed it back to path:
changeset/52919376

Ach ja, weißt Du evtl. was dies hier ist?
way/131730185
Evtl. road_marking=dash?

Bitte mal prüfen:
Es gibt zwei Relationen name=Travemünder Landstraße, ich denke diese kann gelöscht werden:
relation/1793028
Allerdings sind nicht alle Member davon in relation/1658339

Esri sat image now shows a turning loop next to an amenity=parking

I don't know the road and cannot see it on sat images, so I really don't know for sure. I assume hw=residential may also fit, esp. when you have a name as well.

Hi!
Please review highway="residential et éclairée"
Did you mean highway=residential + lit=yes?

Hi!
I've corrected the unusual highway=parking_aisle
to highway=service. I did not add service=parking_aisle because I don't think that this is their main purpose.
changeset/52916811
See also service=parking_aisle

Hi!
Please review the rarely used highway=access on way/532407488
I assume you meant hw=service?

Hi!
Please review highway=5 on way/389925791
Maybe you meant addr:housenumber=5?

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I know it is a bit late but I've noticed this changeset because you added a lot of points with tags that are not useful for OSM.
I've removed the data here:
changeset/52880719
Please let me know if you think that the data is useful for OSM and I will help to make it useful.

I've reverted most of this changeset here
changeset/52880303