please review:
the tag highway=track;path
is invalid:
way/296513044
Aerial images don't show the way,
so it requires local knowledge to fix
this.

I've changed it to residential and adjusted a few more roads , see
changeset/35185889

no idea?
te rog revizuieste
way/93588386
highway=path;track
nu e valid

okay, now I am really lost.
My understanding is that
physically_present=no
says I will not find a physical bus
stop pole. I understood your first
comment so that the bus stops there
if one gives a sign to the driver.
Did I get that wrong?

please review:
some of the roads were deleted
or changed by user albertoq,
I asked for a review but got no reply:
changeset/35086990
Maybe you can help?

please review:
I just noted that the way
way/72232789
is now without tags and is no longer member of any relation. I am not sure if the way is obsolete now or if the relation was corrupted.

please review:
the tag highway=footway;path
is invalid, I've changed it to path.
way/25780388

please review:
I've changed the rarely used tag
highway=unclassified_link to unclassified
changeset/35104902

Please review:
The tag highway=unclassified_link was rarely used is not documented, so I've changed it to unclassified to make sure that routing software will not ignore it:
way/16160502

please review: I've changed the tag
highway=stepping_stones to
highway=path
and added a
ford=stepping_stones
See
changeset/35105253
This change was also discussed here as an example for a "bad change" causing "data loss", so please let me know what you think about it:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2015-November/074913.html
See also
ford=*

Danke für die Rückmeldung :-)

welcome to OSM! Please review:
way/379188743
is tagged highway=residential,unclassified.
which is invalid.
The way is short and connects two other residential roads, so it is probably also a residential road.
See highway=* for more details.
Unfortunately this wrong tagging is still supported by verion 1.7.4 of the editor iD,
so please take care and happy mapping ;-)

Hi, I've just added the tag highway=stepping_stones again.
Reg. my armchair mappings:
I try to be careful, I try to contact mappers
before or after a change asking for review.
I see no other way to reduce the number of tags which are not easy to understand
and I think that OSM should not contain
too many of them, esp. not with the highway key.

okay, this tag is used quite often together with bus_stop, so I think I'll just add it to those two bus_stops.

Thanks for the information. I understand now that this is a very special case.
I changed the tag to highway=bus_stop a few days ago, now I am unsure what to do.
I guess the best would be to remove the highway=bus_stop tag and only keep the node?

sorry for the late reaction, I was offline for a while. Before I started changing the ways with the highway=residential_link I searched for any hint when it should be used and only
found a discussion in a german forum which came to the conclusion that minor roads don't have link roads. I am not sure if my translation is 100% correct, but also OSM Inspector and the renderer of osm.org don't seem to "like" this tag.
I just read the posts in the list and found no comment which says that my change is wrong, but of course I can revert it if you want me to do that.

okay, thanks for the feedback.
I don't feel like a newly-converted, but
yes, I am eager to reduce the number of
(now) ambigious tags ;-)

please review:
the tag
highway=residential_link should not be used,
the *_link tag is only useful for major roads.
Does this way really exist ?
way/259136210

@pascal_cyclist:
Just to make sure:
way/368900734
You have deleted this way again. I am not a local, so I have no idea if that way exists and how it looks like.
I just tried to point out that the tag highway=tour should not be used
for any way.

please review:
some ways have the invalid tag
highway=primary;residential
now.