OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
35189030

please review: the tag
highway=path;footway
is invalid.
way/283162433

35188829

bitte prüfen:
Beim mergen ist was schiefgegangen:
highway=track;service
surface=gravel;paved
Habe leider keine Ortskenntnis.

34966642

reg. the name: I am not a local, so I can't say. The original tags said Norris Street
for the longer part of the current way.
The tiger tags still show both variants, so yes, please add a note and I'd try to contact Richard , the initial mapper:
@Richard

30054404

please review the junction near
node/1373874109
I am not a local, and maybe Bing is out-aged here, but
1) I see no direct way like that marked by
way/123114934
2) The link roads should be tagged
highway=secondary_link, not residential_link
3) Also the two link roads
near node/1373874107 seem to be
highway=secondary_link, not primary_link
(guess that was just overseen when the way way/123103585 was changed from primary to secondary

27969043

please review ways
way/320759609
and
way/320759628
If you call those links, I think they should be tagged primary_link, not residential_link. On Bing they also look like oneways.

29417989

please review:
I've changed the tag highway=residential_link
to tertiary_link:
changeset/35210851
Not sure why you selected residential_link ?

34245634

please review:
I've changed highway=residential_link
to
highway=service
service=parking_aisle
changeset/35210733
See also
highway=service

35132494

OK. Thanks for the feedback!

35137906

thanks for the quick feedback :-)

35120619

well, sorry for my uncommented change.
This "definition" of a *_link is very new to me,
it sounds reasonable, but I wonder why
the wiki documents only *_links for major road types. You probably noted the discussion about my changes:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-tp5859298.html
It would be great to have a few more comments on this question.

35157134

bitte prüfen:
4 Wege sind wohl versehentlich als
highway=turning_circle getaggt, scheinen aber Gebäudeteile zu sein:
way/378961398
Was war da gemeint?

35132077

please note:
I've changed three ways which were tagged
highway=driveway
to the well documented
highway=service
service=driveway
changeset/35194147
See also
highway=service

35137906

please review:
way/362625341
what does
highway=Jana Onufrego Zagłoby mean?
I assume you wanted to change the name tag?

35132494

please review:
The tag highway=stop_position is rarely used in OSM. Does it really fix something?

34548911

done

34966642

Are you sure that the merged road is
named River Side Drive ?

35105253

OK, thanks for the feedback and the correction.

34700725

I saw that you changed other parts of the relation
relation/2317544
Still, two parts have invalid tags and might be ignored by data consumers:
way/303489122
way/354559053
Please let me know if I can help to fix the problem.

34548911

okay, so I'll revert all my changes and leave
highway="bus_stop CUS" untouched in the future until one finds a better way to tag that
element ?

34310695

no idea ?
See
way/354559053