Residential areas are also used as lancover for just that, a built up residential area, not for making a big random square over other landcover types like you do.

That doesn't change the official fact that there is no residential area or village name in Kartverket data. If you feel there should be then complain to them.

Please stop adding a big box with residential for Austrepollen. There is no such thing. Austrepollen is a road name and a bay, not a residential area.

There is no int_ref for this road as its a country road with number 546. Please remove the int_ref from Fanavegen.

You are breaking several land cover relations with your edits. Suggest using JOSM editor that is better at dealing with these. Also try reducing the areas you edit in the beginning.

Why keep changing this from official plans? The final road will be imported from NVDB when its done anyway.

Why are you setting this as construction? Did they actually start on the last part if the ring road?
Haven't heard anything about this on relevant project sites.

Why was this changed to construction?

Any documentation on changing this to motorway? As far as I know this road is not a motorway yet if it will ever be. The description is also not good.

Thank you. No idea how I managed to delete the tag on the part 5 of the import work. I'll check the entire municipality for errors with OSM Inspector or similar when its all done.

Hi, welcome to OSM. Please do not attach things to the address nodes as they are updated from Kartverket via scripts.

Welcome to OSM. Please do not modify the address nodes in OSM for Norway. They are added and maintained via official cadastre database. Make a new point with the data for shops.

Did you check wiki before doing N50 imports? This is not the proper way to do this. Please read osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue/Topography_import_for_Norway#Framgangsm.C3.A5te

Welcome to OSM. Make sure you do not use Bing in Norway it is inaccurate. Use the preferred imagery Norway Orthophoto

Data er tatt frå Forsvaret sin database, så om det er feil så bør dette meldast inn til dei. https://kartkatalog.geonorge.no/metadata/forsvarets-skyte--og-oevingsfelt-land/3d0fe246-ae76-4e88-af1f-c0b0405e83c1

This is actually wrong. This spelling was declined in the official name database and "Dalssætra" is the proper spelling. https://stadnamn.kartverket.no/fakta/187666

It's a long time ago so not sure if I went to wikipedia or some other sites to verify, but I do that often to make sure. I never just grab a bunch of elements and retag them.

Just fixed the errors of mixing generator and plant in same object.

Please undo this mapping in Norway, it is illegal to do full circuit mapping here. You also deleted the MP relations on several power infrastructures and replaced them with closed polygon destroying my detailed mappings.

And to be fair the guy deleted my mapping first for no reason.