* West of Malmesbury

Hi
way/248872034#map=19/50.76938/0.28137
There is already a railway=station tag.

relation/166570#map=11/51.5662/-2.1074

Note the diagonal straight green line to the East of Malmesbury. This is the old data. The tiles haven't rerendered yet. For some reason OSM-carto is quick to remove a render but slow to re-add it.

What do you think requires amending to enable the relation to render?

Hi
1. Large relations tend to be at the back of the rendering queue, especially if done in sections, as I have. This is work in progress.
2. There was a recent problem with OSm-carto rendering. This may have increased the delay.
The old relation is still rendering.

As someone of 12 years & 12,832 changesets experience, I'm surprised you're unaware of 'rendering patience'

Hi Welcome to OSM
Other useful additions would be address data for your house (& any neighbours).
addr=*

In OSM we try to keep existing objects, amending them where necessary, instead of deleting as it beneficial to keep a historical record of its updates.

Hi
There are now two Cannock railway stations

Hi
There are no cycle lanes on these roads. This changeset needs to be reverted.

Hi
highway tags shouldn't be added to route relations

Hi
When did Station Rd get a cycle lane? What form does it take?
way/4409820
This isn't a cycle way as it's accessible by motor vehicles to industrial units.

Hi
Could you please add more descriptive comments to your changesets other than just hashtags..

To check, why do you think certain sections aren't electrified?

I think this needs reverting. You've copy-pasted a whole railway line. https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=86946862

There was already a railway=station.at Norchard

JOSM doesn't default to 'yes'.
It's tagging window edit boxes remembers the last selection plus lists the preceding five.
It's possible to add tags to similar objects in one go. Quite easily if those objects are placed on a separate layer.

Thanks for the reply.
I'm unsure about the tagging though. Defining them as 'house' (OSM's 'standard') is just a quick as adding 'yes' in JOSM. Given the number of existing buildings tagged 'house', I assume your rendering software must be able to recognize the tag?

Hi
To check: Is this in construction, as in workers & track laying equipment on site?

Hi
Could you please give a bit more description of your changesets. a swell as #livingmap-osm-84
What does the '84' represent?

Says someone who made 20 separate changesets over the last day.
Disappointing to see you're a contributor unwilling to take responsibility for his actions.

Seriously?
I asked about the current validity of one of your edits. I 'pointed it out as the specific thing that needed changing' using well known & popular OSM validating software. You then criticized me for asking. How am I meant to interpret that other than "rude"?

OSM contributors will always be contacting you to ensure the OSM is as accurate as possible. They will use the software provided, whether you interpret as "creepy", "weird" or "stalkerish", or not. Please get used to it.

I don't know why you querying my question. Your edit of that node clearly shows it as a railway station under CONSTRUCTION.

Why are you unable to read accurately?