OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
35575080

Hi
Is this still happening?

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/2415734885

775337

Hi
node/181310448
Do you have any current details of this? Is it still on the books?

74030227

Hi
What's a "service_station"?

60358362

"what is the definition of a halt in the UK "
Well, as pointed out in the newsgroup thread, no one really knows/agrees. For the NR stations 'Halt' other than literally 'stop' is so vague it leads to confusion & false data. I believe having all as railway=station, even down to the miniature, consolidates the info. Clearer subtags (such as request_stop) can be added to improve quality if required. I'm considering something like station=miniature to coincide with rail=miniature tag on the tracks.

As you may have noticed even these tourist routes are inconsistently & randomly tagged with a mixture of stations & halts.

84464231

Well,can't you amend them to how i said as your amendments are half right?

84464231

Hi
Version 4:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/220857485

Re: names: I'm unsure what you mean. Bridges of all types should have their name tagged using bridge:name for the reason I gave.
Example:
way/148028614
You've swapped the name of the road for the bridge name. That section of road now has no name.

84464231

Hi
Is there a reason you added tunnel?
way/220857485

'name' should not be used on bridges as they can clash with highway names:
bridge:name=*

78731767

I know. As I indicated in my first post. That doesn't make it a tunnel. It is still a bridge structure

covered=*
or
bridge=covered

78731767

Hi
Why have you tag it as both bridge & tunnel? These are clearly in confliction.
If the railway passes above the water line it is still a bridge, even if it's covered.

70788178

Is this really scrub?
way/693638094#map=19/53.52761/-2.48988

60358362

Sort of.Please have a read of this thread (it continues into Feb)
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-January/024096.html

Basically 'halt' is to ambiguous/subjective.
I've change all the commercial stations to 'stations'. I'm working my way through tourist lines. Every halt already has a usage=tourist tag & I'm adding the specific 'request_stop=yes' where I can find appropriate data. (I'm emailing them to find out if it isn't obvious). It makes little difference in any of the main renderings.

83712469

OK; what should it be called?
What are "relief lines"
Doesn't the Great Western Main Line also carry freight & other services?
How should that be renamed?

86123296

No
There should only be one railway=station, but there can be multiple building=train_stations, per station.

See also multiple building=school objects within one school site.

60358362

Could you check please. i think you added the incorrect Glanyrafon wiki tags.

86093582

Thanks. Done

86123296

Hi
building=train_station

81351703

Hi
What is "Cup of Tea"
Cafe?

85770819

Please don't add railway=station tags to buildings. There are already station nodes.

85709743

Hi
'Ticket office' is not it's given name. Please revert.
Add facilities as nodes within the building:

shop=ticket

amenity=vending_machine

85679995

Please don't delete valid data (ref:crs from railway station tags)