Don;t connect ways to the station node.

node/3648408660

Please don't add duplicating websites.

They both appear to have been diverted since I was last there.

https://snipboard.io/AEcCdD.jpg

Please update when you next visits.

There's no point in having an accurate map if information can't be viewed.
There's nothing wrong in positioning a label to help make it clear. Clarity is a part of being accurate, obfuscation makes for inaccuracies.

I move railway station nodes ways from the centre of the stations when they obscure other items, such as station buildings, footbridges & items on the platforms. This makes for a more *accurate* map.

Nobody is under any illusion, apart from you apparently, that that label referred to anything other than the directly adjacent village.

Err... it's all renderings.
Moving labels so they don't obscure other entities is a common sense practice performed by cartographers the world over.
It's disappointing to see you make edits which are detrimental the quality of all map renderings.

To not use the English language for changesets within Britain, is "less than productive". I will assume "you are not acting in good faith" & treat them with suspicion.
Please reinstate the correct wikipedia URLs.

You didn't detach from the line, you duplicated, then deleted valid data from the original. By reverting your changeset I removed data that reduced the quality of the OSM database. i see you've now removed that data again.

node/14020170357/history/1
node/262345559/history/22

Revert the vandalism of valid data to these entities.
node/262345559/history/24#map=19/50.178586/-5.441159
node/262345551/history/35#map=19/50.183969/-5.436510
node/262345520/history/29#map=19/50.197101/-5.463706

Why not?
It's a valid tag containing valid data.

It refers to rail track & stations, not stop points, platforms, shelters, bus stop, bicycle racks, WH Smiths all of which I've seen added to route relations. PTv2 has led to some of the worst mapping I've come across in OSM.

Relations are not collections of things:
osm.wiki/Relations_are_not_categories

I'll reply to changeset comments as & when I see fit. I'm not at anyone's beck & call in OSM.

Your edits had numerous errors including three duplicating railway stations. Unsure why you were unable to notice the existing station nodes directly adjacent to your additions. From experience when errors are >4 then there are certain to be others & it becomes too much time & effort to amend individually, hence the revert.

If you had commented on your British located edits in the much more "productive" English, you may have received a more expeditious reply.

Hi
Why have you added monorail tags?

Please don't delete valid data. Retaining the history of entities is useful.

Hi
You replaced it with a like for like.
way/1545638671#map=15/51.44578/-2.56314&layers=V
Please retain ways for historical purposes where possible.

Hi Please only 'complete' if you're aware of what's on the ground.
One is clearly not grass & i think the other isn't even a pitch any more.

Hi Could you expand/clarify your edits.
Why was this way deleted?
way/106446506

Hi
node/10055803283

Merseyrail is a train operating company, not a network,
I've previous;y added operator tags to all stations.

The tracks & stations are part of the National Rail network.

It's why this tag which you deleted exists & is valid.
https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/stations/bkq/

Zoom in on Box73
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/cae051befa5649fbb318c836afe901c1/page/Page

There's more to mapping OSM than (often out of date) aerial imagery. On ground surveys take priority.

When I last walk past this sign was still there.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/KfU2NUw9LnrwWuFa7

If you're unsure about something you can add a 'fixme' tag to the object, add a note to the webpage map, or ask on one of the many forums.

I've already done it for you, but for future reference, OSM has a 'correct your own mistakes' policy. There are a few changeset reversion tools available,

Do not delete valid, current, authenticated PROWs

edwq fefe fqqq hl;klllsd sad www f dgr 'er

There's a clue in the name!