1. Raise an issue with the developers.
2. Stop using Relatify.

Hi
I primarily based my amendments on this post:
https://www.instagram.com/p/DDy4MpgCXWq/

Open only a week, including Christmas. No signs of stalls. Where's the vending machine? Where has Maureen's located during the repairs? I never noticed it when walking through.

The huts are due to return at sometime. Retaining them as disused for the moment as the history of an entity is beneficial.

Reverting back from a way to a node doesn't really improve the OSM database. I wouldn't take any validation software as carte blanche to amend items. If they're overlapping the best solution is to amend them so they don't.

You done it again, in multiple areas.
way/1346491652

Without a valid response, I'll consider this erroneous & revert your changesets.

Hi
Why are you splitting these roads?
way/1346459768

Hi
The network is Glasgow Subway.
The operator is SPT.
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/29751009

Hi
way/1346017210

As the cycle lane is unprotected it is already tagged on the roadway as 'cycleway=opposite_lane'

way/167283

Hi
please refrain from removing tags of railway stations.

Hi
User mstrbrid has made amendments to you cycle lane additions which I'm not sure are correct. You probably have more on ground knowledge than me so you may wish to verify.
changeset/

Why have you removed this stretch of cycle lane?
https://maps.app.goo.gl/dmx4v6cmQUxzg9pf6

Hi
Has this stretch of painted cycle lane been removed?
https://maps.app.goo.gl/ZY5EY4PQyR75RwAV8

Just because Maproulette suggest you change something it doesn't mean it should.
As I said, post your edit there is *still* " a sharp turn in a highway".
It brings no benefits to the OSM database.
Please refrain from making these types of edits.

Split these splays is pointless. It *doesn't* "Eliminated a sharp turn in a highway".
It makes no difference to routing software.

Ta

Hi
way/1326493580

You added this bridge, but at a skewed angle to the original abutments. Has it been placed like this, with paths separate from the actual track bed, or is it using the those bridge abutments as support?

https://maps.app.goo.gl/TPih31Uofp6WZoGRA

The defib in my original comment is still clearly there. Refrain from removing valid data.
https://snipboard.io/v9ZXeU.jpg

I'm reverting your changeset.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=574568798244777

node/10868932089

This one is behind a hedge!

"Pic4Review application that imported it."

But that was the image you used to assess whether there was defib in use.

Neither does this one. It's below the fence!

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=555918446838475

node/9725749123

The mapillary link you provided show no such proof.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1109320790038287

Hi
How do you know this defib has been removed?
node/6952288081/history