OK, I've moved it to Dartmouth Road south of the river, here:- way/289446720#map=19/51.437117/-0.054304&layers=N

Regards Bernard.

OK, so now I've checked the postcode and see it's for a different Dartmouth Road, SE23 3HN. The POI at present is at NW2 4EP. Can you move it or do you need help?

Regards Bernard.

Moved the POI to the building number 59 as per the POI address. If this is an online-only business, (no public access to a shop) it shouldn't be tagged as a shop.

You are adding untagged lines to OSM. These lines are meaningless. Please stop doing this, please read the mapping guidelines or seek help. If you have questions please just ask, maybe I can help.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've added tags to your buildings, without tags your mapping is meaningless.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You forgot to tag all these building. I've tagged them but please check the tags and see if I've missed any.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The correct tags would be building=house
house=detached rather than building=detached. I've made the changes.

Regards Bernard.

Hello Steve,
I've looked into this a bit further.
Apparently a temporary permissive bridleway has been created, (lasting until 2030), as an alternative to the extinguished paths).

The route of the temporary permissive bridleway is shown here (3rd map down):- https://www.stneots-tc.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/115/2025/08/planning-committee-agenda-2025-08-12-Website-Supporting-Docs.pdf

The final route of the proposed bridleway is shown here (yellow line):- https://www.huntsramblers.org.uk/images/106_Footpaths/St_Neots/BM12427-052%202%20Jan%2025.pdf

So it seems the temporary path should now be available.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Regarding the four highways you've tagged as abandoned:highway=path. These paths are not abandoned; they remain PRoW. Your information source page pertains to a proposed extinguishment and creation. Untill and if the Highway Authority actually makes any such order they are publicly accessible on foot, even if obstructed. I refer you to the Cambridgeshire rights of way map:- https://maps.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/?tab=2

Regards Bernard.

These new highways duplicate existing highways, thus disrupting routing. I've reverted the changes. Please amend/correct the existing highways.

These new highways duplicate existing highways, thus disrupting routing. I've reverted the changes. Please amend/correct the existing highways.

Way: Chinna Kadambur Mottur Road (1529169005) and Way: Chinna Kadambur Mottur Road (559748649) because the duplicated existing highways.

Hi, OSM is a live worldwide database from which a huge number of maps are compiled.

You are welcome to add genuine features to OpenStreetMap, but please don't add fiction. I've removed Way: Lanhydrock Pokémon Mega Evolution TCG Trail (1528854549) as it is fiction, it duplicates existing highways, and causes disruption to routing.

Regards Bernard.

Way: Mehsi - Madhuban Rd (1528627799) removed it duplicates an existing highway. please amend/correct existing features

You are again mapping highways on top of existing highways, which disrupts routing. Duplicated highway Way: 1528491928 is removed. Amend/correct existing features please.

Duplicated highway (Way: Mehsi - Rampur Khajuriya Rd (1528620468)) is removed, it disrupts routing.

Please amend/correct any existing features, not just map over them.

Way: 1528620469, duplicated highway line removed it disrupts routing.

The duplicate highway removed, it disrupts routing.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Squaring up the house outlines would make them look even better. That's shortcut "Q" in the iD editor.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap where you are allowed to map genuine features without causing harm to the database. The OSM database is used live worldwide to allow folk to compile maps.

Unfortunately you've added many duplicated highways with fiction names. This could cause disruption to routing. Thus I've removed many such duplicated sections of highways.

You can add these pokeman ways to your own personal map without uploading them to the OSM database.

Reards Bernard.