BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 183188757 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. OSM is a live worldwide database from which countless maps are compiled. Thus, OSM shouldn't be edited merely for fun. Your edits here deleted a cycle way crossing, which would cause disruption to routing. Thus, I've reverted this changeset, all is OK now. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 183070519 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed some duplicated sections of highways, changed highway status to from pedestrian to residential and joined numerous crossing highways. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 183093733 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please take notice of the warnings given above. I've just now corrected many self-intersecting highways and removed several duplicated highway sections. These problems could cause disruption to routing. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 183106292 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Most of these dwellings should be tagged building=house
Regards Bernard. |
|
| 183046445 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The OSM tags in this case would be:- loc_name=St Mark's Park
Regards Bernard. |
|
| 182954927 | Hi, I've removed your new highway (Way: Sahebganj - Mehsi Rd (1517885011)), because it duplicates an existing highway and thus could disrupt routing. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 182857873 | Way: 1516742822, duplication, removed. |
|
| 182845726 | Way: 1516483857 is removed, as it duplicates an existing highway. |
|
| 182845726 | Way: 1516483858 is removed, as it duplicates an existing highway. |
|
| 182844042 | Your new highway Way: 1516452464 duplicated the line of an existing highway and could cause disruption to routing. Thus, I've removed it. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 182844042 | Your new highway Way: 1516452463 duplicated the line of an existing highway and could cause disruption to routing. Thus, I've removed it. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 182843543 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your new road Way: 1516450247 duplicated the line of an existing highway and could cause disruption to routing. Thus I've removed it. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 182857568 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I don't think there is an art gallery here in the middle of this public pedestrian area. In fact, your website says "our retail gallery is primarily online". Thus a gallery can't be verified (osm.wiki/Verifiability#Planned_features) at this location. OSM seeks to map on the ground verifiable features. Thus I think the POI should be removed. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 182712429 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. By the imagery available, your tracks look more like field boundaries than highways. Do you have any positive evidence of them being highways, have you spotted a vehicle somewhere? Regards Bernard. |
|
| 182709243 | Hi, I can definitely say it's not correct because a layer=-2 joins the next section tagged layer=2. Between the layers minus 2 and positive 2, there are layers minus 1, 0, positive 1, so minus 2 and positive 2 can't be joined. It's a bit difficult to understand the layer tag; an explanation is given here:- layer=* Bear in mind that layer=0 (which is usually ground level) does not usually need to be tagged, as in its absence it is implied. It's difficult for me to visualise the layout as I've never been there. I can't work out the heights from the imagery shadows either. Do you have any photos? Regards Bernard |
|
| 182644860 | Duplicated highway Way: Magam-Budgam, via Russu (1513478060) removed. |
|
| 182709243 | Hi, You have to section up the roller coaster track and properly layer them to reflect which section is above another. At the moment, OSM regards the tracks to cross over on the same layer, big crash. This is for both looping tracks. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 182629759 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunatly your new highways duplicated existing highways. This duplication could cause disruption to routing. Thus I've removed all the duplicated highways. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 182501521 | https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipOEl7gULIsVUGqxZou6x5JY6sECv2Dj-T0tTM3J
You can also see them for the next few hours here:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=74.18045&lat=32.15780&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas Regards Bernard PS Changesets like this with 86 features are hard to find a specific feature. Thus OSM advice is ti limit a changeset to less than 20 features. |
|
| 182501521 | Hi, I've removed several sections of duplicated highways that you somehow mapped. Please try not to place a highway on top of an existing highway; this duplication could disrupt routing. Regards Bernard. |