Duplicated section of highway removed.

Hi, the tag sidewalk=yes is meaningless on a footpath; the tag sidewalk is meant to be used on a carriageway where the value would be either left, right, or both.

The tag layer=0 in unneccessary; in its absence, layer=0 is implied.

Regards Bernard.

Duplicated section of highway removed.

Please tag any restrictions precisely, there's obviously some access here if only foot inside the area.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The node tagged as a camera mapped in OSM is not "Spying on innocent people". The camera node in OSM is telling innocent people that there is a real camera watching them. Please don't delete the reinstated node; it's helping people.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, your 3 new sections of bridge highway are placed on top of and joined to existing highways making duplications that could disrupt routing. Thus I removed them.

If a feature needs correcting, then it should be the existing feature that is corrected.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted this changeset because it only adds duplicate highways. You placed 2 highways on top of existing highways. This could disrupt routing.

If a feature needs correcting, please correct any existing feature.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just to point out that the height tag default is in metres so your tag height=2 (6ft 6inchs) is likely incorrect. For buildings the measurement is taken from the terrain to the top edge of the building (roof). Please see:- height=*

Regards Bernard.

Oh, I see the first one was mapped in 2022, By OSM practice that one (Node: 9956428711) should be corrected thus keeping the history maintained. Could you do this please?

Hi, Right now there are two cameras mapped at this position, at least one is wrong. (Node: 9956428711 and Node: 14069146001). You seem to have knowledge of the camera, could you please correct the problem?

Another duplicated highway removed.

Again I've removed extensive duplicated highways. Please have regard to the warnings given above.

I've removed lots of duplicated highways that you added around here. Duplicated highways can disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.

Fiction park removed. That's a residential area; please only add genuine features.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Regarding the footpath Way: Elland 107-3 (1546590202). If it's a footpath with obviously foot access then the tag "access=no" should not be used. Instead tag the actual restrictions. I've removed the access=no tag.

OSM only uses formal, verifiable names; Elland 107-3 isn't the name. It's the PRoW reference; I've changed it.

There are fence lines mapped across the path, which doesn't look correct. Could you please make corrections, perhaps adding stiles or gaps in the fences? I'm no local so I can't determine this.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks. I've tagged it as barrier=fence.

I've mapped the barrier as seen on imagery. Do you know the type of barrier, wall. bollards or just a kerb?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've corrected your tagging to reflect the road status as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Reverted because it only added a duplicated highway, which could have caused routing problems.

Changeset reverted because it only added a duplicated highway, which could have caused disruption to routing.