Way: 1352277420, Way: 1352277421 are remove as they duplicate existing highways.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the highways Way: 1352277435 and Way: 1352277436, mainly because they duplicate existing highways and that the tag highway=road is not an OSM valid tag. Please tag the appropriate highway status tag, highway=road

Way: 1352277437 and Way: 1352277438 are clearly tracks, I've amended and joined to the highway network.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Many features dragged out of alignment here, I think I've replaced all of them.

Duplicated highway removed.

Hi, Partial revert to reinstate dragged outlines of shops, Beats, Simmons, Oskar.

Reverted to reinstate post box tags.

Hi, Will you be coming back next year to correct the crop tag for each field in this area. If you don't think you can then please don't use the crop tag as next year it will be misleading.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've removed it.

I tweaked the tags to OSM practice.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The trig point is returned to its original position. Please be careful not to inadvertently move features, this is a live worldwide database.

Hi, A few duplicated paths here, I think I've fixed them.

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've joined the south end onto Middlesex Road.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've reviewed your additions.

Very large area Way: 1350978574 is not a house, I've removed it.

Fields unjoined from road center lines. If you zoom right in you can more precisely draw features.

Way: Landrace house (1350978577) should be drawn round the house only. I amended areas. The same apply to Way: 1350978582, I've corrected.

Your residential areas Way: 1350978575 and Way: 1350978576 are drawn within an existing residential area so duplication, which I've removed.

Farmland fields like Way: 1350978584 should be drawn around the field only, not to include other areas. If they have to include other areas then you should make multipolygons. Much easier to make small areas of single fields. I've corrected this area.

Please take a bit of time to find out OSM best practices of mapping. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Yes could be, I was having problems uploading this morning. Then went on to look at other things. Kept trying to upload then everything went at once. As I recall there weren't any conflicts so I take it all was OK as far as the data was concerned.

Oh, Sorry about that, I tweaked a footpath from the common and playing field areas

Hi, Firstly anything added to OSM must be verifiable. OSM verifiability is explained here:- osm.wiki/Verifiability

An explanation by Frederik Ramm, a leading OSM moderator is given here:- https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/72910/how-should-i-map-an-online-shopping-store

In summation, anything added to OSM must be on the ground truth and physically verifiable at the site.

Regards Bernard.

Online shops are not allowed on OSM

Hi, There's some misunderstanding. Firstly OSM is a database openly maintained by anyone who wants to contribute. The only stipulation to features in the database is that they are ground truth and verifiable by anyone else.

You have removed the tracks across that field from the OSM database. I'm not contesting that as they were not linked to the general highway network. Some aerial imagery showed the tracks some didn't.

OSM is not Google Maps, Google Maps is a private company. The tracks across the field are not on Google Maps anyway so you have no worry there.

There is a track on OSM and Google Maps leading to the caving club. Whether it has a public legal status or not is of no import, anyone can add such features to any map. If you can see it, in any way, you can map it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The name is not the house number so I've removed that tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreeMap.

House 33 is mapped so the node is not needed.

Regards Bernard.