Hi, All land is private whether it has a PRoW is irrelevant. At the moment no PRoW is claimed across this land. If/when a PRoW is claimed then confirmation would be determined upholding or dismissing the claim.

Hi, Thats now reverted. You might need to reload or refresh your browser to see the revert.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for responding.

I can easily revert the whole changeset to the original OSM state. As you've got a backup I think that's the best thing to do. Would you like me to do this? If so please don't make any further changes until after the revert.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just to let you know that you've added a huge number of untagged nodes. Could you please look at tagging or removing them? Also, a lot of nodes are outside the building outline.

I don't know a lot about indoor mapping, that a specialist area, but are you missing the corridors and internal room layout?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This AED location does not seem correct. I cannot find it on the fitness4less website and the site looks like a private residence.

The point of mapping AED's to OSM is to aid the public in accessing the nearest AED in an emergency. Unfortunately this AED lacks vital information ti assist the public. If it;s only for your own private use it ought not be on OSM.

This webpage:- emergency=defibrillator will help with appropriately tagging an AED.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Features added to OSM must be ground truth and verifiable. Thus I've relocated your building from the middle of the highway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've unjoined the residential area from highways and then features.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've joined the path to the road at the south end.

Regards Bernard.

fiction reverted

reverted fiction

Fiction removed.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately this changeset dragged lots of features out of alignment. Thus I've reverted it.

Please be careful not to damage anything.

Regards Bernard.

Hi papaj,

User papaj doesn't respond, so I've amended those buildings. I had to resolve the other issues I previously pointed out.

Regards Bernard

No response so I've removed it.

No park here, fiction removed.

Your actions cast the company in a bad light.

Hi, Your fiction has been reverted.

You are welcome to add genuine features to OSM, need help just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see you've somehow added three defibrillators in close proximity, which doesn't really look right. I would think that the only defibrillator is the one on the car park, is this correct? If so the other two can be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry but your landuse=residential area covers a lot of other different types of areas. Thus I've removed it. The tag landuse=residential is used when mapping land areas used only as residential.

The boundary line for Marlborough is here:- relation/3411516.

If you could explain what you hoped to achieve maybe I could help.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you please show or point out the verification as to the permitted bicycle access on these two tank tracks. If there is legal access for cycles I would think there is also pedestrian access. If there's no legal access by statute or permission then folk could face prosecution for entering. So as I said could you please verify the access.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, There doesn't look like this business is located here in the road. Only verifiable ground truth features should be added to the OSM database. So this feature should be properly mapped or removed. Do you need any help?

Regards Bernard.