Please note that Sakhnin was already mapped by node/278475752

Done

אני מאמין גדול ב
Map what's on the ground

osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground

אם היה שלט בשטח, ההיתי מוסיף

כן. יש שם חניון מוסדר. בעמוד ענן יש לו אפילו שם, אבל בשטח אין זכר ללוח ההנצחה שהיה שם

I visited the place and could not find a path at the edge of the area where I was.
I therefore removed the misleading path tag from way/620497439.

I have restored the path after a survey was done by the Yarok Balev NGO confirmed its existance.

changeset/102242153

The road has a dead end, so no change is required if the problem is not getting *through* it.

If there is no public access to the road, using a gate for example, then an "access=private" tag can be used if pedestrian access is not allowed, or a "motor_vehicle=private" tag if access is not allowed only for vehicles.

A road should be deleted only if it no longer exists.

I suggest you revert this change.

I meant to write "Hi Gal,"...

Hן Gשךת

It seems like this driveway exists.

See https://www.govmap.gov.il/?c=201026.85,644938.16&z=10&b=2 for a detauiled aerial photo and its existance in the goverment's map.

Following our discuttion at changeset/100693305, I suggest that future removal of paths and roads from OSM will be done only when there are multiple reports or when there is additional evidence.

אלו שאלות שאתה צריך להפנות לרט"ג
:-)

המיפוי ב
OSM
צריך לייצג את העובדות בשטח

כך גם אני חשבתי, אבל היום ההיתי שם ובדקתי את השילוט בשטח

אם נבחר צד בכיכר, או בשדרה, הרי שניווט עם כלי רכב יוכל להתבצע רק בכיוון אחד

שלום ניר,

תודה על התיקונים והשיפורים שאתה מכניס למפות
OSM
ו
Israel Hiking!

הנוהג בישראל הוא להוסיף שמות של סיגנלים לתג
mtb:name
ולהשתמש בתג
name
לשמות כלליים, כמו שמות רחובות או שבילים רב-שימושיים.

זה מאפשר למפות המיועדות לרוכבים להציג את שמות הסינגלים מבלי שהשמות יציפו מפות שאינן יעודיות לרוכבים.

תודה,
זאב

Thanks for the clarification!
I've removed them.

Hi Gal,

One option is to use a "surface=unpaved" tag for unpaved paths and footways. See surface=*

Moovit can then choose how to handle them in your trip plans

Hi,

Are you sure about the existance of these tunnels?
In my last visit there, I was unable to stop near any of them.

I'm only certain that way/550720219 does not exist. The road is lower that the old track. If this section existed, it would have been a bridge...

Hello Gal,

There is nothing urgent in resolving this.

I would be very interested in understanding how the Moovit trip plan wants to handle hiking trails and help to see how it can accomplished using the OSM tags.

Hi Gal,

I mapped this hiking trail about 8 years ago. I don't know what is its condition now. In any case, this is a hiking trail, not a a paved road.

Can you clartify what is the source of your understanding? Did you visit the place, or did you get it as a report from a Moovit user?

Can you clarify if Moovit wants to route pedestrians though hiking trails. If not, how do you differentiate between hiking trails and other pedetsrian-only ways.

Best Regards,
Zeevc

Hello Gal,

What was the source of this edit?

As the original mapper of way/211162368, I can guarantee you that it is not a stream.

The ואדי זיו stream was already mapped as
way/547520385

Best Regards,
Zeev

Thanks!