zstadler's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 143003041 | Hello sefabaris, Please do not continue this! The OSM volunteer team has enough on their hands. These kind of acts do not increase the popularity of the Palestinians. You probably understand that such damage will not remain on the map, so what's the point? |
|
| 143218439 | No worries! |
|
| 143218439 | Hello, Please note that it is not possible to view the contents of this changeset using OSMCha
This is probably because it covers a large area and it was open for more than an hour. During this time, many other changes have been done in the area, and the tools are unable to process so much information. In the future, please split such edits into separate, smaller, and localized changesets. Thanks! |
|
| 143179851 | Handling the manual edits of coastlines that were done during the mixture of vandalism and reverts is a topic that should be discussed when it's relevant and their improvements can be evaluated. |
|
| 143179851 | This is probably on purpose since the ways that now include them should be reverted properly before these nodes could be deleted. |
|
| 143179851 | As far as I can tell, this changeset fixed most of the nodes moved by mistake in changeset/143091238. You are probably aware that it did not handle nodes that were added earlier in changeset/143049662, such as nodes 11285524168, 11285555370, and 11285478706. It also did not handle nodes added in changeset/143091238, such as nodes 11287555585 to 11287555588 |
|
| 143052270 | Revert of the accidental deletions was done in changeset/143123512. |
|
| 143091238 | What should be done with this changeset? |
|
| 143091238 | IMHO, reverts should be separated from edits so we could compare their outcome with the expected pre-vandalism state of the map. @SomeoneElse, Do you mean that this changeset is not a DWG revert!? |
|
| 143091238 | Another example:
It has 12 nodes after this changeset (version 13). |
|
| 143091238 | For example, node/1033293880/history
It is in location 32.1611790, 34.7846907 after this changeset (version 12). I also do not understand why would there be new (version 1) nodes in a revert. |
|
| 143049662 | ||
| 143091238 | My suggestion is also to delay the repair of this changeset. |
|
| 143091238 | I believe this changeset is corrupt.
It can be seen in in the editor
I suggest there will more repairs in parallel with the repair bot launched by SomeoneElse_Revert |
|
| 143092890 | Please note that the remaining path is not connected at node/10963975537 |
|
| 143092897 | Please note that the remaining road is not connected at node/10862080130 |
|
| 143066970 | I meant to write You probably understand that such damage will NOT remain on the map, so what's the point? |
|
| 143066970 | Reverted in changeset/143068938 |
|
| 143066970 | Hello joyboy007, Please do not continue this! The OSM volunteer team has enough on their hands. These kind of acts do not increase the popularity of the Palestinians. You probably understand that such damage will remain on the map, so what's the point? Bonjour joyboy007, S'il vous plaît, ne continuez pas ça ! L’équipe des bénévoles de l’OSM a assez à faire. Ce genre d’actes n’augmente pas la popularité des Palestiniens. Vous comprenez probablement que de tels dégâts ne resteront pas sur la carte, alors à quoi ça sert ? |
|
| 142866576 | Please note that the quoted section is about ADDING ALTERNATIVES to the "name:he" and "name:ar" tags. The Israel page does not override the general approach for "alt_name:*", but rather apply it to the specific case. If and when a better translation/transliteration is done, that editor will determine which name should be in "name:he" and if "alt_name:he" is needed. |