Well, yes, the official city stop can also be used for intercity marshrutkas, why not. Although if it's not used more or less systematically for boarding or alighting, but only sporadically, then there is no point including it into the route. Otherwise, people will expect to be able to get onto that marshrutka but will be ignored by it in reality.

*if you turn on

node/9788941265 is actually in the correct spot, there's a shelter visible is you turn on imagery from NAPR: osm.wiki/NAPR

Otherwise, yes, it seems indeed that node/10074662217 should be moved to the north of it and edited accordingly

partly reverted, see changeset/183177984

Which minibuses are these? Do they indeed stop in the middle between the highway and the duplicating road? Or rather at the same side of the duplicating road where the fuel station is located? Do they stop there regularly and allow boarding/alighting or is it just a stop near e.g. toilets?

cliff or earth_bank?

Is this really what you wanted to create? A shop selling swimming pools, named Netari, without any cafe?

partly rv — not the whole area is a building; and don't use a generic name, only a specific name for this particular fuel station or brand

changeset/183176188

@simonschaufi , can you clarify, which minibuses precisely? There are city minibuses which are official and with numbers; but likely they stop a bit to the south at node/9788941265 (they should do according to ttc.com.ge , but they don't always obey it). And yes, there are intercity minibuses, which usually only have destination written above. There's a node node/10074662217 for Telavi minibuses, which, I guess, is not 100% precise; likely it should be moved and a description listing all directions should be added.

But in any case, it's not a bus station, as there is no infrastructure. Just a stop.

reverted — there is definitely no separate station there. But see node/10074662217 (maybe need relocating) and way/509648544

changeset/183018788

Amaghleba?

fixed properly now: changeset/182974495

partly rv - it's 4 level from the side street

changeset/182899520

partly reverted: it's always more convenient to keep POI separate from building, even when it's the only POI there; and building:levels of a building should be the maximum building:levels of all its buildings parts

changeset/182684581

reverted - no reason stated for private access

changeset/182572893

reverted - no reason given for a "minor fix", and no problem with the map now

changeset/182559882

For the reference: the majority of the buildings in question will most likely be detached houses for a single family. Maybe a couple will be for 2-3 families, but still that's not apartments.

I can't agree with the following:
way/690452761
way/880484484
The addresses were mapped from the ground, e. g.: https://maps.app.goo.gl/7iG63Fpikd5TEzQ88
If there the "new" addresses were not mapped from the ground, they'd better stay in addr2, for example.

And wrt parts of relation/20668961 : first of all, the main building lacks "building" tag; secondly, the addr:unit tag is to be used for particular apartments and similar; using it for building parts or parts of housing complexes is incorrect. I can't recall any address signs on the building; but if it looks like this: https://maps.app.goo.gl/9CgrWch4F5zAGvVQ6 - then it can go into refs of entrances.

Точно? Там были знаки "нет сквозного проезда" (белый круг), а не "нет въезда"/"односторонняя дорога" (кирпич/стрелка)

Hi! Please use official aerial imagery from maps.gov.ge, where possible (for example, when buildings are already visible, like here). Just type the same address as can be seen here changeset/181884215 in "imagery used" tag into the "Custom" option when editing via browser.
Also, "parking_aisle" is only for inner additional lanes withing a parking space (generally, in really large parking spaces near shopping malls or airports). The road leading to parking as well as the "main" lane within the parking is just "service".