yelisey90's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 184967557 | You have disconnected the roads from the overall road network. That can't be true; please fix that |
|
| 184963119 | reverted - these roads do not lead to any residential buildings or to any service buildings, so by definition they are tracks |
|
| 184962497 | reverted - the road exists, why shouldn't it? |
|
| 184951811 | partly rv for way/1316204239 - see the more recent ESRI imagery |
|
| 184927379 | partly reverted: judging by street-level photos, through passage for cars along way/196951974 is impossible. Unless barriers and access are properly mapped, better to leave it as footpath |
|
| 186140947 | way/1533713641
|
|
| 184900988 | partly rv — there aren't two roads there; if you want to draw the intersection in full, pay attention to the number of lanes, one-ways & restrictions |
|
| 184899620 | If way/1534199783 is used to get into the parking lot, then it's not parking_aisle. Please fix that |
|
| 184893079 | ||
| 184892110 | partly reverted: no through access here according to all the maps & street-level photos, but no idea why is it impossible; the road should added only after on-the-ground examination |
|
| 184841400 | These are not driveways. service=driveway is for access roads, that is generally leading to private houses. Roads to fuel stations are just service roads, please fix that. |
|
| 184841652 | reverted - just incorrect |
|
| 184832741 | Once again, way/1533780073 & way/1533780074 are nor parking aisles, as they lead out of the parking lot. Please fix that |
|
| 184820733 | Don't forget that if there's a technical storey at the top of an apartment building, it's still a separate storey and should be counted in building:levels, even though it may be less in height that a regular storey. Usually, if there are small window slits, then there's a technical storey |
|
| 184774621 | service=parking_aisle should only be used for connecting roads withing a parking lot, that is between roads that are used to get in and out of the parking lot. This one is not such a case. Please read the wiki page |
|
| 184728635 | ||
| 184820001 | partly reverted - balderdash, no such road exists |
|
| 184814726 | way/1533617380
|
|
| 184813965 | partly reverted for way/1211524262 - extremely unlikely, should be checked from the ground |
|
| 184790351 | If way/1533506599 + way/882766179 form a bridge above the road, then they should have no common nodes with the road below |