That node would be out of date.

I must've missed that one when running conflation.
I just updated the stations the other day

Thank you for taking the time to add the facebook page for the museum!

Next time can you use the page's username instead of the share URL. In this case, it would be espace.felixleclerc

Can you please update features along the road if you change the alignment as much as happened in this changeset.

Small adjustments to road geometry is fine. But when the road is reshaped, please take the time to update other features around it, especially since you have the up to date imagery.

Because of the geometry change done, there are now trees and grass landuse that cross the road,
the bus stops are now not along the road.

Please don't leave messes for other people to clean up.

Thank you

Please do not change the road classifications without talking with the local community.

The consensus has been to keep it as-is.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/route-du-president-kennedy-saint-georges-to-maine-usa-trunk-road-or-not/117398

Please don't blindly accept the recommendations from the editor to change the names of features.

The proper name, as in the one that goes in the `name=*` tag, should be in french in Quebec, regardless of what the editor tries to suggest

please don't blindly move the `place=*` tag to `border_type=*`, they require more nuance.

in quebec, there are no towns per say, only cities (ville).
And Quarters should most likely be borough, or neighbourghood according to its administrative status,

All CC licenses are not compatible with osm, as described at https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

Reverts the following:
174801135
174801294
174801435
174801799
174817344
174820558
174820445
174820393
174818969
174818737
174817798
174817725
174817628
174817579
174817431

The government data is licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 which isn't compatible with osm, you need a waiver; of which there are none for any Quebec ministry.

See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/acceptation-du-mode-dattribution-dopenstreetmap-par-le-gouvernement-du-quebec/127403/15

The industrial zone is indeed present in many sources:

- https://toponymie.gouv.qc.ca/ct/ToposWeb/fiche.aspx?no_seq=436538
- https://www.parcsindustriels.ca/index.php/parcs-industriels/03-capitale-nationale/parcs-industriels-03/parc-industriel-copernic
- https://www.journaldequebec.com/2018/05/31/le-ikea-sera-situe-au-parc-industrielcopernic
- https://www.ville.quebec.qc.ca/gens_affaires/implantation-projets-immobiliers/projets-industriels/docs/Parcs_industriels_carte_generale_villeQuebec.pdf

changeset/174671275

Bonjour,

SVP bien vouloir tagger la tension des lignes électriques.

Dans la grande majorité des cas, les lignes a 3 files c'est du 25000V, et a un fil c'est du 14400V

Vous pouvez aussi regarder la documentation dans le wiki:
osm.wiki/Power_networks/Canada/Qu%C3%A9bec

You can't use the interactive maps provided by cities as they are only meant for consultation only.
The data is the exclusive property of the municipalities

The border was imported using data from Stats Canada and Geobase, which was the only approved data source at the time.

Hi,
Can you please share the sources used in your changeset, and be more descriptive?

What exactly did you change to the municipal borders?
Where did you get the data from?

Yes, please revert the changes.
Thanks for your understanding

Hello,
Can you indicate whether you have the permission of the VdQ in order to use this data?

The osm license and CC-BY 4.0 that use the VdQ are not compatible.

See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

Hello,
Thank you for trying to improe address and building footprints data.

The city's interactive map is not an approved source, as the data is for consultation only. It isn't meant to be reused elsewhere

While the city does publish some open data regarding addresses, its data is licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 which is not compatible with osm, it needs an explicit permission with a waiver.
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

Hello,
Thank you for trying to improe address and building footprints data.

The city's interactive map is not an approved source, as the data is for consultation only. It isn't meant to be reused elsewhere

While the city does publish some open data regarding addresses, its data is licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 which is not compatible with osm, it needs an explicit permission with a waiver.
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

Could you add that to your change sets in the sources?

Yeah, sometimes the locations don't match exactly between the locality and the station sign. The actual station sign location should take precedence.
In cases where there is a locality that references the station sign or junction, it should be merged with the newly created railway site

Yep I see the signs. The main track end sign is something that can be mapped as well, though there isn't a defined railway tagging for signals or signs in Canada.
You can help out by adding your knowledge to osm.wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Work_Rules_in_North_America#CROR

Just a reminder to not use Google Street View for OSM

Bonjour,
Pouvez vous indiquer si vous avez la permission de la VdQ afin d'utiliser ces données?

La license de osm et la CC-BY 4.0 q'utilise la VdQ ne sonts pas compatibles.

Voir https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

It seems as though in my last comment, I failed to mention `railway=site`

osm.wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Other_operating_sites

If it's an actual junction, then `railway=junction`, if not `railway=site`