Hi IlBano,

thanks for spotting this error. I have now completed the work of correcing the roundabout geometry, including the foot-cycleway crossings. The corresponding foot-cycleways that connect the crossings are stlll missing.

Ciao. Quando inserisci marciapiedi, non dimenticare le connessioni con le strade.

Friulano (?) non è su Google Translate.
Il motivo della mia domanda era curiosità di capire quali dei vari tombini in strada sarebbe l'idrante sulle foto Mapillary. Anche come loro (i pompieri suppongo) definiscono la posizione relativa alla strada, un problema che mi sono posto per ostacoli su piste ciclabili.

Fonte precisa?

Thanks for correcting. Have you detected more of these elsewhere? This was an unintended by-product from my first attempt to use Vespucci. I noticed it but left it to investigate later.

The source information is not correct: you cannot use OpenStreetMap as source for OpenStreetMap data

This changeset contains a large number of wrong riverbank geometries: too large and connceting in some places unconnected crossing waterways. I suggest a complete revert and restart from scratch.

Perché hai tolto i nomi del Canale Scaricatore e San Gregorio?

Thanks - corrected

Thanks!

This changeset contains a large number of trees that do not correspond to real objects on the grounds (example node/2508848737
which is part of a road-side tree-row, but only about one-in-three is in the data,). I Please consider reverting the trees from this import.

Hi,
in this changeset you seem to have tagged many or all building vertices with building=yes, in addition to the tag building=yes on the closed way that represents the whole building. This in not correct, the vertices are not buildings, they are only part of a closed way that represents a building. You should remove all tags building=yes from nodes that are building vertices. There are some 4500 of these nodes - see
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yHB
If you have problems removing them yourself, please contact me via OSM

Where did you get the street name from? "Via Sambin" is not on Bing aerial imagery.

What's the data source for this planned road?

... and node/1323976715 looks more like histroric=wayside_shrin

Please do not add highway=road. Please check the Imagery available in the area and pick the correct highway value.

Please ignore my question - I have now looked at the history - my fault.

What is the source of these data, They are not visible in any of the usual background maps in ID?

Thanks for pointing this out. Corrected.

Of the three roundabouts only one has been implemented so far. But also this is in the wrong position. Also the changeset source is wrong as obviosly the Bing Satellite photos do not show the not-yet-existing roundabouts.
Please revert this changeset. The map should not contain non-existing features. You can add features under consruction with the appropriate tagging, provided you have construction details with an OSM compatible license.