OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
179190165

I can remove them on my own, or you can do it if you want

179190165

The first mentioned way is marked as razed (no remain). I know there is an disscusion on using it, but I have no strong opinion on it.
For the second way, the buildings are clearly aligned along the way, but it can be caused by something else than the railway.
So if you thing the ways can’t be there, I have no problem with removing them.

179190165

Hi, I found it there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N%C3%A6rum_Line#
and also checked the visible ‘line’ in terrain.

179489930

Hi,
we got this as a report from our user. I deleted it now, but I'm curious why the users keep reporting this place as 'Punta Cane e Gatto' as this wasn't the first report about it. If you got any suggestions (I think you are local) why this happenes, please let me know.
Kind regards.
V

179258676

Supr, díky moc.

179258676

Jinak druhého pilíře jsem si nevšiml. Pokud se shodneme, že tam tagy být nemají, tak dává smysl je odstranit i z druhého.

179258676

Ahoj,
tagy jsem smazal, neboť byly podle mě chybně. layer=1 by znamenalo, že je pilíř na stejné úrovni jako mostovka (ale ve skutečnosti je pod ní). underwater by zase znamenalo, že je objekt pod vodou (kompletně), což se využívá třeba u podvodních kabelů nebo potrubí.
Samozřejmě nemám patent na pravdu a je možné, že existují argumenty, proč tam tyto tagy mít.

179028941

Hi,
I just improved the geometry of roads from current Bing Aerial Imagery (I can see I didn't put Bing to sources of this changeset, sry). I fixed a lot of ways by redrawing it (delete all nodes of the way except first 2, then draw the rest of the line from scratch), so it could result in many deletions.
BR

178509630

Hi,
I didn't find on the wiki, that the area=yes is needed for the place=square. But I added it, because it is easier than finding if it is needed and why.

178525020

Hi, thanks for the info. What will happen, will it make another node in next import? If yes, I think that the import tool should check if the address node exists.
Or please explain the reason in more details. Thanks
V

176498111

Hi, you probably did some mistakes. For example here [way/44584245/history] you put the maxspeed value '40' also to the 'name' tag. I fixed those I managed to find.

175796563

Probíhala tam rekonstrukce asi 3 křižovatek (a již skončila, podle toho co jsem našel). Pozici přechodu jsem zkontroloval v projektové dokumentaci a odpovídá to tomuto místu.
V

175961691

Mapy.com nejsou vhodným zdrojem. Mohou obsahovat chyby (jako pravděpodobně zde) a především nemají kompatibilní licenci (a nesmí se tak používat jako zdroj dat pro OSM). Nejlepším zdrojem je vidět situaci ve skutečnosti (nebo na fotografii) nebo alespoň v nějakém oficiálním zdroji (ŘSD).

175961691

Dobrý den,
je tento úsek opravu označen jako I/35? Geoportál ŘSD jej označuje jako nájezd na dálnici (a tedy nikoliv silnici 1. třídy). Můžu vás případně poprosit o nějaký zdroj (fotka, cokoliv)?
Díky.

173922195

Thanks. I fixed it now.

173424466

Thanks for the details, I changed tagging, so only part between the tunnel and C. Verde is marked as closed.

I think that the main problem is that the IFCN doen't even think, that tourists may use non marked routes. So they often mark (on https://ifcn.madeira.gov.pt/pt/) the whole route as closed. But in reality, only part of it is closed/is the reason of the closure and the rest is accessible.

BR.

173424466

Hi, thanks for clarification. So the part is de-iure closed (according to the official information). But when you use the Pico Ruivo Tunnel, you will not see any signs etc., so practically it is opened (from this side). Am I correct?

The question is what we have to map? Is official information about closure enought to mark it as closed? How to map it in this case, when you can go from one side (no signs), but not from another.

Or is there (way/174842408) any sign, which say that section to Cald. Verde is closed? So only part between this place (exit of the tunnel) and Cald. Verde is really closed?

Thanks.

175229310

Tento úsek není silnicí první třídy. Podle https://geoportal.rsd.cz/apps/silnicni_a_dalnicni_sit_cr_verejna/ se jedná o nájezd na dálnici (motorway_link) a skutečné značení také neukazuje, že by tomu bylo jinak. Upravil jsem zpět na motorway_link

175879106

Dobrý den, dálnice je zatím uzavřená, je tedy nutné při změně z constuction=motorway na highway=motorway přidat i access=no (zákaz vjezdu).
Na tomto úseku to teď opravím.
S pozdravem.
V

173424466

Hi, PR 9 between Caldeiro Verde and Caldeiro do Inferno is CLOSED. I changed access to no. See https://ifcn.madeira.gov.pt/pt/atividades-de-natureza/percursos-pedestres-recomendados/percursos-pedestres-recomendados.html
where is written, that PR 9 is OPEN but this section remains closed.