changeset/182080486

changeset/182080486

changeset/181964283
changeset/181994029

Ciao Ivan,

non mi risulta di star cancellando nulla tranne il nodo di Forcola che era perfettamente adeguato anche come alt_name di Sirta.

In secondo luogo, ho già detto che non c'è nessun problema se c'è bisogno che ripristini la situazione precedente.

Cordiali saluti,
Martino Scaglione

Salve, in primo luogo, mi spieghi più nel dettaglio perché secondo lei non è corretto.
Mi sembrava più giusto in quanto la località di Forcola non esiste ma è semplicemente il nome del comune.
Se vuole che ripristini l'elemento di Forcola procedo assolutamente senza nessun problema.

Cordiali saluti,
Martino Scaglione

Nessun problema, se non è d'accordo ripristino la situazione precedente. Il centro storico è implicito nella località di Sondrio, perché Sondrio è situato nel centro del paese, Madonna del Rosario è il nome della parrocchia di riferimento della zona.
Se vuole indicarmi qualche altra cosa con cui non è d'accordo è invitato a comunicarmele e cercherò per quanto possibile di venirle incontro.

Cordiali saluti,
Martino Scaglione

Hi,
you're right, it's not useful to have a POI without anything in the real world to back it up.
I'm gonna delete it now.

Thank you for your feedback.
Martino

No problem, I had no idea this was a ongoing issue.
I will change the place type back.

Best regards,
Martino

changeset/181141956

Hi, it's simply because a lot of places tagged as city in Portugal would not be considered cities in any other place.
From a simple query on the number of place=city in Portugal the result is 158. In Italy, which is double the size of Portugal, the number of place=city is 95.
France: 62
Spain: 88
Germany: 84
Clearly the concept of city is inflated in Portugal, and a place like Vila Real de Santo António (pop. 11.360) would be considered a town anywhere else, since there are about 750 places in Italy with more than 15.000 inhabitants and only 95 places tagged as city.
This change is not intended to be limited to Algarve but to the whole of Portugal in which the distinction between town and city is not clear.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City

Best regards,
Martino

wrong comment for changeset
meant to write:
changed wrong tag of "suburb" to "neighbourhood" and improved names of POIs

Luzern is definetely a city, as Lugano.
Not up to discussion, they have the infrastructure, population, importance of cities, and are regarded as such by literally everyone. I don't know on what basis someone could describe them as towns. Just because they are officially described as cities doesn't mean that they are NOT cities.
Sankt Gallen, while certainly less important, is described as such on the Wikipedia page: "Today, it is a large urban agglomeration (with around 167,000 inhabitants in 2019) and REPRESENTS THE CENTER OF EASTERN SWITZERLAND"

Biel, on the other hand, can be safely described as a town, although an important one.

Non occupa l'intero edificio, occupa anche l'area intorno all'edificio.

Sì in effetti la chiesa era meglio prima, adesso reverto direttamente questo changeset e cambio quelle piccole cose che avevo ragione a modificare, come i nomi delle vie e delle scuole.

Ho connesso le due strade tertiary, che è buona regola che non finiscano nel nulla

<There are no signposts along the way after Soglio, are there?>
Yes there are signposts that have written "Sentiero panoramico" on them, and moreover I followed the map from my first answer that shows that that path goes from Casaccia to Prosto.

<(The Via Bregaglia actually doesn't have a number on the Swiss side, either. I guess you meant the Via Panoramica.)>
Yes it has a number, it is simply not shown on the guideposts, https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Via_Bregaglia

<They were based on surveys, GPS traces and current information from the responsible tourist office.>
I changed only the relations, I didn't change any actual segment of the routes, so this point doesn't make sense.

<Your source is only a schematic map that doesn't even include the Bondo variant>
How is this relevant, I didn't delete the Bondo variant, even if it was not shown on the map.

<The new Via Bregaglia variants you introduced are actually only dotted lines on your source map, indicating that they are not part of the official Via.>
Precisely because of that I didn't added them to the official Via, but I added new relations describing that they were variants; I don't know if they have any official status, but if they are shown on that map it doesn't seem too nonsensical to insert them on OpenStreetMap.

Two other things: the map comes from the website bregaglia.ch, that is the official tourism website for the Val Bregaglia, so nothing particularly untrustworthy, and, just to be precise, I deleted only one relation.
That one relation was the italian Via Bregaglia segment, as there is no such thing as the italian Via Bregaglia segment, there is only the Via Bregaglia as whole and the officially-sanctioned Maloja-Soglio segment.

I hope I made myself clear.

[I followed this when creating variants, and when determining startpoints and endpoints](https://www.bregaglia.ch/images/VIA--BREGAGLIA.jpg)

In the rest I simply tidied up all the different relations, creating a relation for the official routes of Switzerland and a relation for informal routes that encompass also the italian part of these official routes.
I.e. the italian part of Via Bregaglia does not have any ref number, but the swiss part, that goes from Maloja to Soglio, has an official number and is part of the official footpaths of Switzerland.
I created a relation for the swiss official footpath and a relation for the Via Bregaglia as a whole.

Right, just fixed :)

Yeah, you're right.
My bad.

Infatti l'ho messo come nome alternativo

Restoring places deleted with no reason (the tool didn't give an option to write a comment)