Hi, welcome to OSM. The paths you added in Central Park were a duplication of the existing cycleways. I have removed the duplication.

Hi, welcome to OSM. This edit has gone a little wrong, the Drayton Court Hotel is already mapped, I have removed your duplication.

Hi, welcome to OSM. The paths you have added seem to be pure fiction. There are no marks on the ground and they cross pitches.
Please remember that in OSM we only add what exists in the real world.

Thank you, just couln't see it on aerial imagery

Hi, welcome to OSM. The footpath you have added is a duplication of the existing cycleway, I have removed the duplication.

Reverted

Please remember that OSM is a public database, please do not add personal markers.
I am reverting this addition

Hi, welcome to OSM. Please remember that OSM is a map in which we map what exists in the real world. Please do not retag objects for your own purposes, this is considered vandalism.
I have reverted your changes as neither are parks.

You may want to create new node and tag it as natural=tree, tree=pear.
Just creating a point with a name does nothing.
Cheers Phil

This is normally mapped as historic=memorial then memorial=plaque. You may want to add some more detail, they usually say a bit more than Bobby.
Cheers Phil

Please can you explain this?

Is there really a pear tree in the middle of the road?

Does way/461460787 really exist, it looks like it goes through someones garden?

Reverted fiction

Reverted

I have restored New Walk and Highcross to highway=pedestrian

HI, welcome to OSM. We only map what exists on thbe ground, and we do not mis-tag what does exist. Changing a road to a footpath means map users will not be able to route over it. I consider your change vandalism and have reverted it.

Hi, welcome to OSM. Please remember that OSM is a live database, and we only map what exists in the real world.
Aerial imagery suggests that this path does not exist, can you convince me otherwise?

Hi, welcome to OSM.
I think this change has gone a little wrong, you have changed New Walk from a pedestrian street to a footway which seems a little odd to me as it has been mapped that way since it was first mapped 9 years ago. Just wondering why you consider it to be wrong?
You have also created 2 new footpath ways 461225544 and 461225541, but they do not connect to anything.
Cheers Phil

There is no need to recreate the playgound, the odd title is only on the changset, although you may want to disconnect it from the road.
The name on this path is is probably not verifiable and the path obviously exists so is fine.
It would be good to map the legal lines, if a farmer illegally obstructs a public highway with crops then he needs reporting to the council so they can take action against him. You are legally entitled to walk through the crop, and certainly should not go around to avoid damage.