trigpoint's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 123717864 | Hi
|
|
| 123472728 | And the problem with this edit is? |
|
| 123421872 | I suspect most of my (no comment) changeset descriptions come from before OSM supported them. |
|
| 123421872 | My local post office node/2636954315/history had the correct opening hours and is mapped as a separate node so as you you say should have the opening hours of the counter but now has a strange version of the supermarket opening hours. Its open until 22:00.
Phil |
|
| 123421872 | This edit is not very helpful, the information is very misleading and gives a false impression of opening hours.
|
|
| 123350353 | Hi, this changeset seems a little odd. Why have you added layer=1 to Tesco, it is very much on the ground. |
|
| 123274438 | Hi, thank you for your edit however the cafe is already mapped and I have removed your duplication.
|
|
| 119684563 | I have reverted this change |
|
| 123128256 | When a new mapper appears from nowhere and starts to change tagging which local experienced mappers have agreed on for over a decade makes me think here we go again.
|
|
| 119880046 | > it seems odd that OSM don't have a
|
|
| 122596006 | Thank you |
|
| 122596006 | Shell Island is hardly an insignificant destination |
|
| 122596006 | Bore da
|
|
| 120521090 | Please keep your changes to sensible areas. This changeset covers a large area, several countries and should be broken into several smaller changes. |
|
| 118426681 | Hi
When tagging access on rights of way please ensure you do not break other usecases, this could well be motor_vehicle=private, but it is a right of way for foot/bikes and horses. Cheers Phil |
|
| 118874300 | Thank you however those sites are hardly authoritative and the names appear to have been made up with no on the ground knowledge. Hardly suitable for OSM which is supposed to reflect the real world. A junction name should as a minimum appear on a sign. Cheers Phil |
|
| 118874300 | What is the source of this ridiculous name, nobody calls it Whetstone as it is not in Whetstone. It has no verifiable name but is generally known as Leicester South of just Junction 21. |
|
| 119891252 | You do seem to be adding pointless duplicate name tags, which just adds clutter and makes it harder for unpaid mappers who look after their own local areas to spot the important tags, OSMs most valuable resource are these unpaid volunteers. You don't need to add translated names where they don't differ from the main name tag, any computerised data consumer should be able to use the name tag if there is no language specific name. What source are you using for these edits? Cheers Phil |
|
| 119990551 | Thank you for your reply, however you have not answered my question as to where these edits were discussed with the UK community, I would expect a minimum of a post to the talk-gb mailing list. You do seem to be adding pointless duplicate name tags, which just adds clutter and makes it harder for unpaid mappers who look after their own local areas to spot the important tags, OSMs most valuable resource are these unpaid volunteers. You don't need to add translated names where they don't differ from the main name tag, any computerised data consumer should be able to use the name tag if there is no language specific name. What source are you using for these edits? Cheers Phil |
|
| 119678023 | I suspect the bug you should be reporting is that it is checking motorway bridges at all. If a motorway bridge is anything other than default then there has been an epic fail on behalf of the builders. |